X-Recipient: archive-cygwin@delorie.com
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id
	:list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post
	:list-help:sender:date:from:to:subject:message-id:reply-to
	:references:mime-version:content-type:in-reply-to; q=dns; s=
	default; b=voLfYRizABKHQ+GmcpH5jZiTkhyTtjrmKfOilNENhwxXkRcoLi1bg
	gh0AD1jx1CNvsvnKYxwYpaPwPl8R8DW7ob9QMNzv996Vsv5qf7oh69zd344YXLoF
	nrj2NEGOl2sZlKeIfxdy3sGezFFr5tgjQJ+nz1feuRByfj5q4fWVb8=
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id
	:list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post
	:list-help:sender:date:from:to:subject:message-id:reply-to
	:references:mime-version:content-type:in-reply-to; s=default;
	 bh=xpXBkEhxW+lOCnx3xYds7b7dZwI=; b=EJhUUdITiqDSePrBiZ3neo2KNsly
	UQc4CPMT9JXab5hDpEWZIIdBgV64Rv1ir1Wk0oqunWKD8BtqIYm5sKRFrw/1tSmA
	fx6lj/BATbZzxjpeFomfVlMrL6tr3DKKgQkYRjSluSz3/kyHmhzpD71I1flIhBzp
	x8fhnuaKSMuI4AA=
Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help@cygwin.com; run by ezmlm
List-Id: <cygwin.cygwin.com>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-subscribe@cygwin.com>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin@cygwin.com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-help@cygwin.com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-owner@cygwin.com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin@cygwin.com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin@cygwin.com
X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-1.8 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00 autolearn=ham version=3.3.1
Date: Wed, 24 Apr 2013 14:59:30 +0200
From: Corinna Vinschen <corinna-cygwin@cygwin.com>
To: cygwin@cygwin.com
Subject: Re: Difference in 32/64-bit curl.
Message-ID: <20130424125930.GQ26397@calimero.vinschen.de>
Reply-To: cygwin@cygwin.com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin@cygwin.com
References: <51766C22.10702@bahnhof.se> <51770372.4070408@t-online.de>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <51770372.4070408@t-online.de>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15)

On Apr 23 23:56, Christian Franke wrote:
> Fredrik Rothamel wrote:
> >Hi,
> >
> >I just noticed that in 64-bit cygwin curl always include the
> >http-headers in the response.
> >(Old behaviour is to only include headers when -i option is specified)
> >
> >Is this an intentional change?
> 
> Unlikely. In this case it should be possible to revert the default
> -i (--include) with --no-include.
> 
> According to a quick gdb session using curl-debug package the
> corresponding variable config->include_headers is not set during
> option processing. But later in Curl_setopt(., CURLOPT_HEADER, .)
> the variable data->set.include_header is set true because some
> va_arg(param, long) is nonzero.
> 
> Possibly a __builtin_va_list related gcc bug.

This is rather unlikely.  That code is shared between Cygwin and
Mingw, and chances are that the bug would have been found already.

What about a type issue?  int vs. long?


Corinna

-- 
Corinna Vinschen                  Please, send mails regarding Cygwin to
Cygwin Maintainer                 cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Red Hat

--
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple

