DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id
	:list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post
	:list-help:sender:message-id:from:date:to:cc:subject; q=dns; s=
	default; b=hpQFOEnF4LXW6Z8fnekLYbwmj1T+6Z+AfBtzjRTproMgNKZNwUk4e
	rMTfBoNHGq1uYzNZDTkh///Nnr6KxXzl506pgzcUF6Q9xirdfUJmhYhoOSnDFjHM
	az2ktG26unPd7wLQxTLAIIWsTRAuThIvg6Xayu+mjDDxA4CZ88OkkY=
Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help@cygwin.com; run by ezmlm
Sender: cygwin-owner@cygwin.com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin@cygwin.com
Message-ID: <20130410094721.1040@binki>
From: "d.henman" <dhenman@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 10 Apr 2013 09:47:21 +0900
To: <cygwin@cygwin.com>
cc:
Subject: Re: GCC-4.7.2-2: Go/No-go?


I agree that it should be released.  The sooner the better.
It might help me and others with some building problems I've runn into, that didn't exist before. At the very least, it would reduce the number of variables that might be the cause of unsuccessful builds.

Dave Korn wrote:
>     Hi all,
> 
>   I have a release of 4.7.2-2 ready to upload.  It fixes the dependencies back
> to the 4.5.3-3 curr: version dependencies, makes TLS vars exported from DLLs
> work and restores java and libffi.  I've also been running the testsuite over
> the last few days and the results look quite reasonable.
> 
>   Yaakov thinks (http://cygwin.com/ml/cygwin-apps/2013-04/msg00032.html) that
> I shouldn't release it until I've integrated all his patches.
> 
>   I think (http://cygwin.com/ml/cygwin-apps/2013-04/msg00057.html) that it's
> worth uploading as a stop-gap to address the mentioned problems and
> integrating Yaakov's patches for the next release.
> 
>   Could the list please help us make a decision?
> 
>     cheers,
>       DaveK

--
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple