X-Recipient: archive-cygwin@delorie.com
X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-5.9 required=5.0	tests=AWL,BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,FREEMAIL_FROM,KHOP_RCVD_TRUST,KHOP_THREADED,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,RCVD_IN_HOSTKARMA_YE,TW_YG
X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
X-Received: by 10.50.191.164 with SMTP id gz4mr1012185igc.2.1362789381914;        Fri, 08 Mar 2013 16:36:21 -0800 (PST)
Message-ID: <513A83FE.5040802@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 09 Mar 2013 11:36:14 +1100
From: David Billinghurst <dbcygwin@gmail.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.9.2.28) Gecko/20120306 Lightning/1.0b2 Thunderbird/3.1.20
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: cygwin@cygwin.com
Subject: Re: Shouldn't gcc-4 depend on libmpfr4 ?
References: <CAEhDDbDwsH=CvsJXFFTgbrEhVp_-sUU-q-=tJONYaKP=m95Weg@mail.gmail.com> <5131CD7E.8050001@gmail.com> <loom.20130304T080048-222@post.gmane.org> <20130304090904.GA5468@calimero.vinschen.de> <loom.20130304T110538-61@post.gmane.org> <20130304161925.GA4078@calimero.vinschen.de> <51388D05.3080803@gmail.com> <loom.20130307T151013-550@post.gmane.org> <20130307143845.GB12359@calimero.vinschen.de>
In-Reply-To: <20130307143845.GB12359@calimero.vinschen.de>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-IsSubscribed: yes
Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help@cygwin.com; run by ezmlm
List-Id: <cygwin.cygwin.com>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-subscribe@cygwin.com>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin@cygwin.com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-help@cygwin.com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-owner@cygwin.com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin@cygwin.com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin@cygwin.com

On 8/03/2013 1:38 AM, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
> Hi guys,
>
> On Mar  7 14:13, Achim Gratz wrote:
>> David Billinghurst<dbcygwin<at>  gmail.com>  writes:
>>> Still lurking, but real life has led me in other directions for the last
>>> year or so.
>>>
>>> I am more than happy for someone else to adopt these packages.  I have
>>> had good intentions, and built a couple of test packages, but haven't
>>> actually done anything useful for a while.
>>
>> Hi David,
>>
>> I have working packages that finally fit in with the current Cygwin
>> distribution.  I can send the cygport files to you if you want to update them
>> yourself, otherwise I'll have to find time for a clean install to rebuild these
>> on before they are ready for update.
>
> Shall I mark your packages as ORPHANED for now, David?
>
>
> Corinna
>

Yes.

--
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple