X-Recipient: archive-cygwin@delorie.com
X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.9 required=5.0	tests=AWL,BAYES_00,FSL_HELO_BARE_IP_2,KHOP_THREADED,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,RCVD_NUMERIC_HELO,RP_MATCHES_RCVD,SPF_HELO_PASS
X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
To: cygwin@cygwin.com
From: Achim Gratz <Stromeko@NexGo.DE>
Subject: Re: Shouldn't gcc-4 depend on libmpfr4 ?
Date: Wed, 6 Mar 2013 12:41:00 +0000 (UTC)
Lines: 18
Message-ID: <loom.20130306T133459-48@post.gmane.org>
References: <CAEhDDbDwsH=CvsJXFFTgbrEhVp_-sUU-q-=tJONYaKP=m95Weg@mail.gmail.com>	<5131CD7E.8050001@gmail.com>	<loom.20130304T080048-222@post.gmane.org>	<20130304090904.GA5468@calimero.vinschen.de>	<loom.20130304T110538-61@post.gmane.org>	<20130304161925.GA4078@calimero.vinschen.de>	<loom.20130304T193416-681@post.gmane.org>	<CA+sc5mk2MgnjYA2OtaK7d7Aed_tpqXVoD=80NVQ6-uO=LNSUpw@mail.gmail.com>	<87ip57nf3r.fsf@Rainer.invalid>	<20130305034127.22dc8a65@YAAKOV04>	<loom.20130305T115614-775@post.gmane.org>	<20130306033005.411192a5@YAAKOV04>	<loom.20130306T120329-190@post.gmane.org>	<loom.20130306T125459-574@post.gmane.org> <20130306061514.069bf4d9@YAAKOV04>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
User-Agent: Loom/3.14 (http://gmane.org/)
X-IsSubscribed: yes
Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help@cygwin.com; run by ezmlm
List-Id: <cygwin.cygwin.com>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-subscribe@cygwin.com>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin@cygwin.com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-help@cygwin.com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-owner@cygwin.com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin@cygwin.com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin@cygwin.com

Yaakov <yselkowitz <at> users.sourceforge.net> writes:
> > Gcc now links to cyggmp-3.dll and cyggmp-10.dll and it doesn't like
> > that a bit.
> 
> How so?

I've built and installed a new gmp, then updated and built a new mpfr.  It is
now linked to cyggmp-10.dll, but the mpfr library itself is still cygmpfr-4.dll
and gcc links itself to cyggmp-3.dll... classic dependency hell.

> Of course not, that is the point of library versioning, after all.

Sure.  In this case the library versioning doesn't do any good, however, since
it didn't change even though the result can't be linked.


Regards,
Achim.


--
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple