X-Recipient: archive-cygwin@delorie.com
X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
Date: Tue, 5 Mar 2013 10:26:14 +0100
From: Corinna Vinschen <corinna-cygwin@cygwin.com>
To: cygwin@cygwin.com
Subject: Re: Shouldn't gcc-4 depend on libmpfr4 ?
Message-ID: <20130305092614.GC16361@calimero.vinschen.de>
Reply-To: cygwin@cygwin.com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin@cygwin.com
References: <CAEhDDbDwsH=CvsJXFFTgbrEhVp_-sUU-q-=tJONYaKP=m95Weg@mail.gmail.com> <5131CD7E.8050001@gmail.com> <loom.20130304T080048-222@post.gmane.org> <20130304090904.GA5468@calimero.vinschen.de> <loom.20130304T110538-61@post.gmane.org> <20130304161925.GA4078@calimero.vinschen.de> <loom.20130304T193416-681@post.gmane.org> <CA+sc5mk2MgnjYA2OtaK7d7Aed_tpqXVoD=80NVQ6-uO=LNSUpw@mail.gmail.com> <87ip57nf3r.fsf@Rainer.invalid> <loom.20130305T101428-417@post.gmane.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <loom.20130305T101428-417@post.gmane.org>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15)
Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help@cygwin.com; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <cygwin.cygwin.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:cygwin-unsubscribe-archive-cygwin=delorie.com@cygwin.com>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-subscribe@cygwin.com>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin@cygwin.com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-help@cygwin.com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-owner@cygwin.com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin@cygwin.com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin@cygwin.com

On Mar  5 09:18, Achim Gratz wrote:
> Achim Gratz <Stromeko <at> nexgo.de> writes:
> > It might be that LT_INIT is called at the wrong place
> 
> It looks like moving LT_INIT later in the file whacked autotools into
> submission.  The remaining problem is that the library version changes from
> cyggmp-3 to cyggmp-10.  Not sure how to deal with that or if the new package
> should just be libgmp10 instead of libgmp3 (I have the same problem with mpc,
> the old way of forcing the version doesn't work there anymore).

I think we're better of to use the upstream numbering scheme, as
long as it doesn't collide with already used version numbers in the
Cygwin distro.


Corinna

-- 
Corinna Vinschen                  Please, send mails regarding Cygwin to
Cygwin Maintainer                 cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Red Hat

--
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple