X-Recipient: archive-cygwin@delorie.com X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-3.0 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,KHOP_RCVD_UNTRUST,KHOP_THREADED,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,RP_MATCHES_RCVD,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Message-ID: <5129989E.7020909@cs.utoronto.ca> Date: Sat, 23 Feb 2013 23:35:42 -0500 From: Ryan Johnson User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130107 Thunderbird/17.0.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: cygwin@cygwin.com Subject: Re: Weird threading / __thread behavior References: <5122178E.20705@cs.utoronto.ca> <51297721.6090205@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <51297721.6090205@gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help@cygwin.com; run by ezmlm List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner@cygwin.com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin@cygwin.com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin@cygwin.com On 23/02/2013 9:12 PM, Dave Korn wrote: > On 18/02/2013 11:59, Ryan Johnson wrote: >> On 17/02/2013 10:38 PM, Zach Saw wrote: >>> The following test case fails on Cygwin but passes on Linux (both >>> tested using >>> GCC 4.7.2). >> Cygwin doesn't have a gcc-4.7.2 package yet (not even for testing); >> 4.5.3 is the highest I see this morning in setup.exe. > Sorry gang, I've been on hiatus. > > I have almost got 4.7.2 GTG, and I'm starting to pay some attention to GCC > trunk again. That wasn't meant as an accusation to the maintainer! I just wanted to make sure OP didn't think he had a supported version of gcc on his hands. (Out of curiosity, have you hit any real difficulties/patches with 4.7.2? I've had no trouble with 4.7.1 since I learned to follow the example of 4.5.3 at configure time) Ryan -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple