X-Recipient: archive-cygwin@delorie.com
X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-3.2 required=5.0	tests=AWL,BAYES_00,KHOP_THREADED,RP_MATCHES_RCVD
X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
Message-ID: <511967DD.8030600@etr-usa.com>
Date: Mon, 11 Feb 2013 14:51:25 -0700
From: Warren Young <warren@etr-usa.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.2; WOW64; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130107 Thunderbird/17.0.2
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Cygwin-L <cygwin@cygwin.com>
Subject: Re: Promote sqlite 3.7.13-1 from test status?
References: <announce.5029275C.4040009@etr-usa.com>	<502C0B7D.10909@etr-usa.com> <loom.20120816T092134-266@post.gmane.org>	<20120816085016.GB5536@calimero.vinschen.de>	<502CCBB1.2070600@etr-usa.com>	<20120816105507.GD17546@calimero.vinschen.de>	<502CE120.4050900@etr-usa.com>	<20120816122654.GG17546@calimero.vinschen.de>	<502D1967.7090705@etr-usa.com> <20120816160656.M21257@ds.net>	<502D3A5C.7010500@etr-usa.com>	<00ad01cd7bf6$7cc68a50$76539ef0$@motionview3d.com>	<1345169297.10004.10.camel@YAAKOV04> <87k3qmedzh.fsf@Rainer.invalid>	<51194F7F.8050403@etr-usa.com> <87halio886.fsf@Rainer.invalid>
In-Reply-To: <87halio886.fsf@Rainer.invalid>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-IsSubscribed: yes
Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help@cygwin.com; run by ezmlm
List-Id: <cygwin.cygwin.com>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-subscribe@cygwin.com>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin@cygwin.com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-help@cygwin.com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-owner@cygwin.com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin@cygwin.com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin@cygwin.com

On 2/11/2013 14:23, Achim Gratz wrote:
>
> Warren Young writes:
>>  From my perspective, though, I have a new problem, which is scraping
>> together enough free time to set up the SQLite test suite on a machine
>> here and set it to grinding, so I can exonerate the recent .15.1
>> build.
>
> That's the second time I hear you talking about running the test suite
> for SQLite… where'd you get that from?

 From where?  Nowhere.  I decided it would be a good idea all by myself.

As I saw it, I released some test builds, they caused a new problem, so 
I thought it would be a good idea to see if SQLite's own test suite[*] 
gave the same results on both .13 and .15.1.  If so, then there is no 
regression on Cygwin from that perspective, so that adds a reason not to 
consider the BDB failures with Cygwin Subversion a problem.

[*] https://www.sqlite.org/testing.html

--
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple

