X-Recipient: archive-cygwin@delorie.com
X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-5.5 required=5.0	tests=AWL,BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,FREEMAIL_FROM,KHOP_RCVD_TRUST,KHOP_SPAMHAUS_DROP,KHOP_THREADED,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,RCVD_IN_HOSTKARMA_YE,TW_BJ,TW_JC
X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
X-Received: by 10.224.183.197 with SMTP id ch5mr5872126qab.27.1359565382869;        Wed, 30 Jan 2013 09:03:02 -0800 (PST)
Message-ID: <51095241.5050400@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 30 Jan 2013 18:02:57 +0100
From: marco atzeri <marco.atzeri@gmail.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130107 Thunderbird/17.0.2
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: cygwin@cygwin.com
Subject: Re: Binutils objcopy bug (was Re: rebase segfault)
References: <50F5D246.6010902@gmail.com> <50F653AB.80102@gmail.com> <20130116123509.GA16991@calimero.vinschen.de> <50F6AD63.8080106@gmail.com> <20130124030145.22fa143f@YAAKOV04> <20130124092746.GC8311@calimero.vinschen.de> <510103AF.3080305@gmail.com> <20130124100037.GB24121@calimero.vinschen.de> <51027B9E.3080104@gmail.com> <CAEwic4b6jQkh+5FT+R1um12U09nqHoNcR1Vj7kZpsuvQb7pMpg@mail.gmail.com> <20130125150006.GC26731@calimero.vinschen.de> <5102A09A.7040506@gmail.com> <CAHiT=DE5doJnH43DRmbkn7jhN=+cjPo8Cftfsw6fy0+GkZeSzA@mail.gmail.com> <51038B4F.1090903@gmail.com> <CAHiT=DET_G9kAazCtDLzMxxL62YcZqcQ6y22ODqna7E-v7aA-A@mail.gmail.com> <51094E62.30000@dunslane.net>
In-Reply-To: <51094E62.30000@dunslane.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-IsSubscribed: yes
Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help@cygwin.com; run by ezmlm
List-Id: <cygwin.cygwin.com>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-subscribe@cygwin.com>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin@cygwin.com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-help@cygwin.com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-owner@cygwin.com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin@cygwin.com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin@cygwin.com

On 1/30/2013 5:46 PM, Andrew Dunstan wrote:
>
>>> Autoconf+Automake will be a much cleaner approach, and will
>>> allow to avoid at all the platform checks.
>> Yes, I had the same impression but it is unfortunately not realistic.
>> I worked against dllwrap removal but got stuck somewhere.
>> When I find my old patches I'll hand it over to you. Just came back
>> from holidays.

>
> I will be very happy to work with you to remove the use of dllwrap etc.
> for cygwin. Since I'm a Postgres committer (and the only one interested
> in Cygwin at all) I'm in a good position to do this. I believe the
> Postgres project had problems in the past with automake and made a
> decision long ago not to use it, so we're not going down that route.
> However, that surely need not stop us from getting this working.
>
> cheers
>
> andrew
>

Hi Andrew,
I see most of the other platforms are using "gcc --shared"
instead of dllwrap. I suspect that just switching away from
dllwrap will improve the situation.

Postgresql is the only package, where I was forced to remove
debug information to have a running binary.

I will very happy to work on this change

Marco
(current maintainer of Postgresql package)



--
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple

