X-Recipient: archive-cygwin@delorie.com
X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-5.5 required=5.0	tests=AWL,BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,FREEMAIL_FROM,KHOP_RCVD_TRUST,KHOP_SPAMHAUS_DROP,KHOP_THREADED,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,RCVD_IN_HOSTKARMA_YE,TW_BJ,TW_JC
X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
X-Received: by 10.14.207.6 with SMTP id m6mr27025623eeo.10.1359186774712;        Fri, 25 Jan 2013 23:52:54 -0800 (PST)
Message-ID: <51038B4F.1090903@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 26 Jan 2013 08:52:47 +0100
From: marco atzeri <marco.atzeri@gmail.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130107 Thunderbird/17.0.2
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: cygwin@cygwin.com
Subject: Re: Binutils objcopy bug (was Re: rebase segfault)
References: <50F5D246.6010902@gmail.com>	<50F653AB.80102@gmail.com>	<20130116123509.GA16991@calimero.vinschen.de>	<50F6AD63.8080106@gmail.com>	<20130124030145.22fa143f@YAAKOV04>	<20130124092746.GC8311@calimero.vinschen.de>	<510103AF.3080305@gmail.com>	<20130124100037.GB24121@calimero.vinschen.de>	<51027B9E.3080104@gmail.com>	<CAEwic4b6jQkh+5FT+R1um12U09nqHoNcR1Vj7kZpsuvQb7pMpg@mail.gmail.com>	<20130125150006.GC26731@calimero.vinschen.de>	<5102A09A.7040506@gmail.com> <CAHiT=DE5doJnH43DRmbkn7jhN=+cjPo8Cftfsw6fy0+GkZeSzA@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAHiT=DE5doJnH43DRmbkn7jhN=+cjPo8Cftfsw6fy0+GkZeSzA@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-IsSubscribed: yes
Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help@cygwin.com; run by ezmlm
List-Id: <cygwin.cygwin.com>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-subscribe@cygwin.com>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin@cygwin.com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-help@cygwin.com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-owner@cygwin.com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin@cygwin.com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin@cygwin.com

On 1/26/2013 7:32 AM, Reini Urban wrote:
>>
>>
>> rebase is not to blame. I agree ;-)
>> Someone else is incorrectly managing the reloc table,
>> and also objcopy seems innocent ...
>>
>> Postgresql dll's are built in this way:
>
> My strong guess is dllwrap.
> No other packages uses the ancient dllwrap anymore.
> I tried to get rid of it, but got stuck somewhere else.
>

Hi Reini,
I agree dllwrap seems the coolprit, and "gcc -shared"
seems a better alternative ,
at least on a single test with this dll.

I looked on the postgresql makefiles and it is a big mess to
replace dllwrap; upstream is crazy, they crippled configure
forcing a specific version and refusing to use Automake.

Autoconf+Automake will be a much cleaner approach, and will
allow to avoid at all the platform checks.

Could you make another check on 9.2.2 package before a new RFU
http://matzeri.altervista.org/cygwin-1.7/postgresql/

Thanks in advance
Marco

--
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple

