Message-ID: <50FA5FA9.606@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 19 Jan 2013 09:56:09 +0100
From: marco atzeri <marco.atzeri@gmail.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130107 Thunderbird/17.0.2
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: cygwin@cygwin.com
Subject: Re: Binutils objcopy bug (was Re: rebase segfault)
References: <50F516C8.9050602@gmail.com> <20130115100745.GC2353@calimero.vinschen.de> <50F5312A.2040503@gmail.com> <20130115112406.GA13752@calimero.vinschen.de> <50F5D246.6010902@gmail.com> <50F653AB.80102@gmail.com> <20130116123509.GA16991@calimero.vinschen.de>
In-Reply-To: <20130116123509.GA16991@calimero.vinschen.de>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help@cygwin.com; run by ezmlm
Sender: cygwin-owner@cygwin.com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin@cygwin.com

On 1/16/2013 1:35 PM, Corinna Vinschen wrote:

> This is a serious bug in objcopy in the current binutils.  Given that
> cygport creates the debug info automatically, we might end up with
> spuriously broken DLLs in the distro.
>
> I checked with objcopy from the older binutils 2.51.53-2, and the
> problem did not show up.  I also built the latest binutils release
> 2.23.1 and the problem also doesn't show, so we probably can get away
> with just a black eye by updating binutils to 2.23.1.  Chris?
>

Hi Corinna,
it seems not so easy.

Just built from cvs

objcopy --version
GNU objcopy (GNU Binutils) 2.23.51.20130119

but the problem is still there

>
> Corinna
>

Regards
Marco

--
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple