X-Recipient: archive-cygwin@delorie.com X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.0 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_20,DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,EXECUTABLE_URI,FREEMAIL_ENVFROM_END_DIGIT,FREEMAIL_FROM,KHOP_RCVD_TRUST,KHOP_THREADED,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,RCVD_IN_HOSTKARMA_YE X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.180.24.198 with SMTP id w6mr10993911wif.27.1357588579572; Mon, 07 Jan 2013 11:56:19 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: <786EBDA1AC46254B813E200779E7AD36028CB12E@srv1163ex1.flightsafety.com> <50C881E7.6090600@etr-usa.com> Date: Mon, 7 Jan 2013 11:56:18 -0800 Message-ID: Subject: Re: ctags recursion broken? [ATTN: ctags, xemacs-tags maintainers] From: Alan Thompson To: cygwin@cygwin.com Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help@cygwin.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner@cygwin.com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin@cygwin.com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin@cygwin.com Hi - It looks like there has been no movement on this bug for a month. What is the best way to contact the emacs maintainers? It does not seem correct for emacs (or xemacs) to overwrite the ctags executable. Alan Thompson On Wed, Dec 12, 2012 at 5:08 AM, Warren Young wrote: On 12/11/2012 13:05, Thrall, Bryan wrote: > > Yes, it looks like xemacs-tags and ctags packages both install > /usr/bin/ctags.exe: > > http://cygwin.com/cgi-bin2/package-grep.cgi?grep=ctags.exe Is there an especially good reason xemacs-tags can't depend on ctags, and get its ctags.exe from my package? Or, is there something special about Xemacs ctags that's worth preserving? Or, maybe ctags.exe should just be removed from the Xemacs package. Doesn't Emacs want you to use etags anyway? -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple