X-Recipient: archive-cygwin@delorie.com X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.8 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,RCVD_IN_HOSTKARMA_YE,TW_CG X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org X-Mail-Handler: Dyn Standard SMTP by Dyn X-Report-Abuse-To: abuse@dyndns.com (see http://www.dyndns.com/services/sendlabs/outbound_abuse.html for abuse reporting information) X-MHO-User: U2FsdGVkX18atX0kHo7HyRBpnlkxaKvi Date: Fri, 21 Dec 2012 21:52:59 -0500 From: Christopher Faylor To: cygwin@cygwin.com Subject: Re: Intermittent failures retrieving process exit codes - snapshot test requested Message-ID: <20121222025259.GA5915@ednor.casa.cgf.cx> Reply-To: cygwin@cygwin.com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin@cygwin.com References: <50C2498C.2000003@coverity.com> <50C276AC.9090301@mailme.ath.cx> <50D401EF.9040705@coverity.com> <20121221103241.GD18188@calimero.vinschen.de> <20121221161024.GA10871@ednor.casa.cgf.cx> <20121221170219.GF18188@calimero.vinschen.de> <20121221193620.GA29203@ednor.casa.cgf.cx> <50D4E144.706@gmail.com> <50D4EBFE.6090309@coverity.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <50D4EBFE.6090309@coverity.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help@cygwin.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner@cygwin.com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin@cygwin.com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin@cygwin.com On Fri, Dec 21, 2012 at 06:08:46PM -0500, Tom Honermann wrote: >On 12/21/2012 05:23 PM, marco atzeri wrote: >> On 12/21/2012 8:36 PM, Christopher Faylor wrote: >>> I tested this lightly on Windows 7 and 32-bit XP but it would be nice to >>> hear if multi-threaded things like X work on other platforms too. >>> >>> If you test a snapshot, note that I'm still tracking down Ken Brown's >>> reporte emacs regression in recent snapshots so that will still be >>> broken. >>> >>> cgf >>> >> >> I think the Xserver doesn't like it. >> on 20121221 it freezes on start on W7/64 >> no issue on 20121218 > >I was worried about this possibility after looking at the code changes. > But, I haven't had to a chance to test adequately yet. I would expect >indefinite blocking in dll_entry() may prevent unloading DLLs. For >example, calls to dll_entry() for DLL_PROCESS_DETACH may get blocked. You're looking at the wrong changes. cgf -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple