X-Recipient: archive-cygwin@delorie.com
X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-4.4 required=5.0	tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,KHOP_RCVD_TRUST,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,RCVD_IN_HOSTKARMA_YE
X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;        d=google.com; s=20120113;        h=mime-version:x-originating-ip:date:message-id:subject:from:to         :content-type:x-gm-message-state;        bh=dx3cSp8BOmSu/LlqGO0npdqo5u8sOcAkAqnkcCU7L1I=;        b=RH5UIMvY06m1JK8AXfanTSBBxfEJa1uDYb4iJGWA2WC7nbSTbp9tdyp4sBFch2xtan         HRzkLQ6o7rsg+zW/S3jrdkW+5nHFzhjNZJnvfIk9WtSNTmxhXijrodOv87nhRbsSlgaW         XIFPJWPo1LGEK4KT0bTd3oaPb1uUJHWFVf3kFzUlL09kTkbuC10iDuyxmQVkuFAbhBwe         vHJXnPGenv7RLowDaKe8FDy2GVIaIWZITqFHkLmEmjdEEgq9jhXHbzKwcqupZxgAuY9G         KfRV3lnIqwlrVCDcEX9exYmlpVlbEGsH1YsW/RvdXigPJDyYJ9e8H5JALgUMwNs3vTtX         9fOA==
MIME-Version: 1.0
Date: Tue, 4 Dec 2012 16:34:46 -0500
Message-ID: <CAMgm8F0K9juGwfGy9DZ=DXMqWNkOk04fR_NUox+fGTwDW56Uug@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Bug in Cygwin Windows 8 group permissions
From: Chaz Littlejohn <chaz@pokeit.co>
To: cygwin@cygwin.com
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQm3izv1B0icCXuKvxsfFJzNGplC9FEZmwFNPdhBRhdRbgkc21KmXGSBgSFhkkFQMPk9fC3m
X-IsSubscribed: yes
Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help@cygwin.com; run by ezmlm
List-Id: <cygwin.cygwin.com>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-subscribe@cygwin.com>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin@cygwin.com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-help@cygwin.com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-owner@cygwin.com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin@cygwin.com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin@cygwin.com

> > By my understanding, if you're
> > distributing GPLv3+ software such as cygwin1.dll, these are not rights
> > you can withhold on that software.

> This is true for all GPL versions.  Cygwin's license is GPL with an
> exception to allow any Open Source product to not be infected but that
> is the limit.  You cannot create proprietary software without paying
> Redhat for that privilege; they do offer an alternative license.  See
> http://cygwin.com/licensing.html for details.

Stop me if i'm wrong, but since the program only invokes the plugin by
exec, and the program is not using the dlls or sharing data, it's my
understanding that they're considered separate programs under GPL3 and
the licensing requirements do not apply.

http://www.gnu.org/licenses/gpl-faq.html#NFUseGPLPlugins

Chaz

--
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple

