X-Recipient: archive-cygwin@delorie.com X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.8 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_20,FREEMAIL_FROM,KAM_THEBAT,KHOP_THREADED,SPF_SOFTFAIL X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Date: Mon, 3 Dec 2012 21:26:53 +0400 From: Andrey Repin Reply-To: Andrey Repin Message-ID: <16010315276.20121203212653@mtu-net.ru> To: ht@inf.ed.ac.uk (Henry S. Thompson), cygwin@cygwin.com Subject: Re: IIS on Windows 7 vs. Cygwin file permissions In-Reply-To: References: <466997425.20121203053659@mtu-net.ru> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help@cygwin.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner@cygwin.com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin@cygwin.com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin@cygwin.com Greetings, Henry S. Thompson! >> HST wrote: >>> . . . [IIS and file access] >>> Any suggestions? >> >> Only one: If you intend to mix Cygwin tools with native Windows environment, >> let Windows handle filesystem permissions. >> Or you will never stop running into these issues over and over again. > Fair point. There was a time when Apache didn't run well under > Cygwin, and I got used to using IIS, but maybe it's time to > change. . . I'd suggest native Apache. It runs better, than Cygwin Apache, even though it slightly differs in available modules. And undoubtedly better, than IIS. On another hand, you'll have access to modules such as mod_auth_ntlm. -- WBR, Andrey Repin (anrdaemon@freemail.ru) 03.12.2012, <21:25> Sorry for my terrible english... -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple