X-Recipient: archive-cygwin@delorie.com X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-5.0 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,FREEMAIL_FROM,KHOP_RCVD_TRUST,KHOP_THREADED,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,RCVD_IN_HOSTKARMA_YE,TW_YG X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: References: From: Bob Heckel Date: Tue, 23 Oct 2012 19:07:40 -0400 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Cygcheck says w3m 0.5.3-1 package incomplete, file type mismatch messages To: cygwin@cygwin.com Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help@cygwin.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner@cygwin.com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin@cygwin.com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin@cygwin.com On Tue, Oct 23, 2012 at 6:18 PM, Keith Christian wrote: > > w3m works, but appears to run slowly after the last update. While > comparing the output of "cygcheck -s -r -v" I noticed some > differences. Sorry you're having trouble. Strange, I did benchmarking in development and found 0.5.3 slightly faster than 0.5.2 > Line 24 below shows Incomplete. I'm not sure what's causing that, I show "OK" on my installations. > I re-ran setup.exe, removed w3m, then re-installed from the same > mirror, no change. Did you have 0.5.2 installed previously? > Is this output satisfactory, or is there a corrective action for this > package post-install? I can't replicate it currently, I'll look into it further over the next few days and report back or up-version if I see anything wrong or fixable. If anyone else is experiencing w3m-0.5.3-1 trouble, that would be good to know. Bob -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple