X-Recipient: archive-cygwin@delorie.com X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-4.7 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_05,DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,FREEMAIL_FROM,KHOP_RCVD_TRUST,KHOP_THREADED,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,RCVD_IN_HOSTKARMA_YE X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <1217756072.20120820071446@mtu-net.ru> References: <20120818163404.GA8853@shadow.schutter.home> <1523147992.20120818223708@mtu-net.ru> <20120818201425.GA21116@shadow.schutter.home> <1217756072.20120820071446@mtu-net.ru> Date: Mon, 20 Aug 2012 09:46:53 -0400 Message-ID: Subject: Re: semi-automated installation and/or updates From: Earnie Boyd To: Andrey Repin Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help@cygwin.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner@cygwin.com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin@cygwin.com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin@cygwin.com On Sun, Aug 19, 2012 at 11:14 PM, Andrey Repin wrote: > >> I added the call to rebaseall because of this post by Corinna: > >> http://cygwin.com/ml/cygwin/2012-08/msg00320.html > >> Installing more packages that are forgotten in the first run of >> setup.exe is what I (and I suspect others) do all the time. I would >> love to get some feedback either way on this issue. > > That's something that should be handled in setup.exe, IMO. > May be it's worth putting a clear note, that this is a workaround for existing > inconsistency? (With a reference you gave me here.) I would like to know why you gave the response that it shouldn't be run manually unless there is good reason. What harm might happen? -- Earnie -- https://sites.google.com/site/earnieboyd -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple