Message-ID: <502E212E.10008@hones.org.uk>
Date: Fri, 17 Aug 2012 11:47:10 +0100
From: Cliff Hones <cliff@hones.org.uk>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 5.1; rv:14.0) Gecko/20120713 Thunderbird/14.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: cygwin@cygwin.com
Subject: Re: False BLODA warning concerning cygusb?
References: <502DA4D4.4040809@aa.net.uk> <20120817093920.GC26407@calimero.vinschen.de>
In-Reply-To: <20120817093920.GC26407@calimero.vinschen.de>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help@cygwin.com; run by ezmlm
Sender: cygwin-owner@cygwin.com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin@cygwin.com

On 17/08/2012 10:39, Corinna Vinschen wrote:

> I have no problems with occassional false postives.  The detect_bloda
> option is meant for diagnostic purposes only.  It's not meant to used
> all the time.  It slows down *every* thread start up!

Thanks.  I was only reporting it as I thought I remembered a request
for false positives to be reported.  I think that's why I turned the
detect_bloda option on in the first place.  I must admit I was also
slightly curious - what is an open-source library (libusb) built
under Cygwin doing that makes it look like BLODA? [Of course I
could spend time looking at the source to find out, but time is
in short supply, so I guess I'll just have to stay curious.]

-- Cliff


--
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple