X-Recipient: archive-cygwin@delorie.com
X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-4.0 required=5.0	tests=AWL,BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,FREEMAIL_FROM,KHOP_RCVD_TRUST,KHOP_THREADED,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,RCVD_IN_HOSTKARMA_YE,TW_CG
X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <20120814145328.GB15817@ednor.casa.cgf.cx>
References: <CA+7conmVyztppQN8b=aVp6MhPGLGaswkeTFE3tRa7QDHndsH9g@mail.gmail.com>	<20120813185602.GA22085@ednor.casa.cgf.cx>	<50295185.7020908@dancol.org>	<CA+7con=Fbu91rQ6eudWpAxH6XQvPaC5jerM5U3=ByNK5a1FUhg@mail.gmail.com>	<5029E45B.6020308@redhat.com>	<CA+7conmuVWwG+fo91oPTp4WAvq6RdMUSsozQw7oY-bc1jX0Dzg@mail.gmail.com>	<20120814145328.GB15817@ednor.casa.cgf.cx>
Date: Tue, 14 Aug 2012 23:35:02 +0200
Message-ID: <CA+7conmzOyqp89VbMrtPzn1E8XWLLjw59J6gtN-62waL4=T5Xw@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Side-by-side configuration is incorrect reported as permission denied
From: Pawel Jasinski <pawel.jasinski@gmail.com>
To: cygwin@cygwin.com, cgf@cygwin.com
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
X-IsSubscribed: yes
Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help@cygwin.com; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <cygwin.cygwin.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:cygwin-unsubscribe-archive-cygwin=delorie.com@cygwin.com>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-subscribe@cygwin.com>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin@cygwin.com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-help@cygwin.com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-owner@cygwin.com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin@cygwin.com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin@cygwin.com

Hi Christopher,

I am sorry I did not understand your comments.
I am also not particularly familiar with your COP. I promise to adhere
to it in the future.
For the patches, I can only blame bad timing. I haven't done cvs up
before posting.
As you noticed for sure, I am also not so good with rhetoric.

Cheers,
Pawel


On Tue, Aug 14, 2012 at 4:53 PM, Christopher Faylor
<cgf-use-the-mailinglist-pleasecygwin.com> wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 14, 2012 at 10:37:51AM +0200, Pawel Jasinski wrote:
>>Thanks guys!
>>That is a great news
>
> It isn't entirely clear that you understand that what just happened is
> what we always do when we find a Windows error which we haven't
> translated and for which there is better translation than EACCES.  I
> asked for suggestions, we got a good one, and I changed Cygwin.
>
> I wonder if much of this whole thread has just been a misconception
> about that SOP.
>
> cgf
>
> --
> Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
> FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/
> Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
> Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
>

--
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple

