X-Recipient: archive-cygwin@delorie.com
X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=3.6 required=5.0	tests=AWL,BAYES_40,BOTNET,KHOP_THREADED,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,RCVD_IN_HOSTKARMA_NO,RCVD_IN_HOSTKARMA_YE
X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
Message-id: <502A850A.6040109@cygwin.com>
Date: Tue, 14 Aug 2012 13:04:10 -0400
From: "Larry Hall (Cygwin)" <reply-to-list-only-lh@cygwin.com>
Reply-to: cygwin@cygwin.com
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:14.0) Gecko/20120713 Thunderbird/14.0
MIME-version: 1.0
To: cygwin@cygwin.com
Subject: Re: imagemagick errors under cygwin on 64-bit Win 7 system
References: <loom.20120812T142816-982@post.gmane.org> <5027B4AC.7070407@gmail.com>	<loom.20120814T020312-509@post.gmane.org> <CE9C056E12502146A72FD81290379E9A495FFE3C@ENFIRHMBX1.datcon.co.uk> <502A5675.8010202@gmail.com> <CANLSjUteBXH7P6fBFqsvK3S_F2kZdVT9Qn9wpYGAX-R-4GEPog@mail.gmail.com> <20120814150922.GD18059@calimero.vinschen.de> <CANLSjUtVqVLP3jT3H3oBHT87Bfxe3ssRWBp9q2n_DRLv6Z2vxg@mail.gmail.com>
In-reply-to: <CANLSjUtVqVLP3jT3H3oBHT87Bfxe3ssRWBp9q2n_DRLv6Z2vxg@mail.gmail.com>
Content-type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit
Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help@cygwin.com; run by ezmlm
List-Id: <cygwin.cygwin.com>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-subscribe@cygwin.com>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin@cygwin.com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-help@cygwin.com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-owner@cygwin.com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin@cygwin.com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin@cygwin.com

On 8/14/2012 11:56 AM, Paul Thompson wrote:
>>
>> Wow.  That's rather unexpected.  Unfortunately the error code -2 is just
>> an artefact, not the actual error code.  I fixed that in CVS.  Did you
>> try if rebaseall fixes this issue?
>>
>>
>
> OK, I just learned about rebaseall. I am not actually on the machine
> in question, and will try this tonight. I will report tomorrow on
> results.
>
> I will say that I did just do a fresh install of cygwin for this.
> Should cygwin work straight out of the box, or is the rebaseall needed
> to tailor to specific machine?

If you just went to cygwin.com and installed using the "setup.exe" link
from there, then you shouldn't need to take the added step of running
rebaseall if all else about the installation is proper.  Still, it won't
hurt to try it.

-- 
Larry

_____________________________________________________________________

A: Yes.
 > Q: Are you sure?
 >> A: Because it reverses the logical flow of conversation.
 >>> Q: Why is top posting annoying in email?

--
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple

