X-Recipient: archive-cygwin@delorie.com
X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.9 required=5.0	tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,RCVD_IN_HOSTKARMA_YE
X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
X-Mail-Handler: Dyn Standard SMTP by Dyn
X-Report-Abuse-To: abuse@dyndns.com (see http://www.dyndns.com/services/sendlabs/outbound_abuse.html for abuse reporting information)
X-MHO-User: U2FsdGVkX18fLjVGf98e1kxyrYeQNH46
Date: Fri, 10 Aug 2012 15:08:22 -0400
From: Christopher Faylor <cgf-use-the-mailinglist-please@cygwin.com>
To: cygwin@cygwin.com
Subject: Re: Please test snapshots
Message-ID: <20120810190822.GA17598@ednor.casa.cgf.cx>
Reply-To: cygwin@cygwin.com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin@cygwin.com
References: <50203227.50207@dancol.org> <50205E0E.3060406@dancol.org> <20120808215909.GA29761@ednor.casa.cgf.cx> <loom.20120809T111739-607@post.gmane.org> <5023CF06.2030006@dancol.org> <loom.20120810T082432-17@post.gmane.org> <20120810142515.GE11601@ednor.casa.cgf.cx> <87r4reocjf.fsf@Rainer.invalid> <20120810181235.GA17158@ednor.casa.cgf.cx> <87mx22oav3.fsf@Rainer.invalid>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <87mx22oav3.fsf@Rainer.invalid>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14)
Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help@cygwin.com; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <cygwin.cygwin.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:cygwin-unsubscribe-archive-cygwin=delorie.com@cygwin.com>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-subscribe@cygwin.com>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin@cygwin.com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-help@cygwin.com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-owner@cygwin.com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin@cygwin.com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin@cygwin.com

On Fri, Aug 10, 2012 at 08:33:36PM +0200, Achim Gratz wrote:
>Christopher Faylor writes:
>> ...and those are the kind of details which allows us to at least make
>> educated guesses about problems.  Showing a "defunct" ps listing, not so
>> much...
>
>You know this, but a defunct listing means that a process terminated,
>but wasn't reaped by it's parent process.  Unless that parent process
>crashed hard I can't remember seeing that happen in Cygwin, which is why
>I thought it noteworthy.

...and that's why I asked:

>> It's probably too late to ask but is the make process still around?
>
>I killed make because I forgot to add a variable definition on the
>command line.  Only later did I find it left that zombie git process
>that should have been terminated with it (I know it was associated with
>that particular make invocation by its start time).

So you don't know if the make process was actually still around.  Got it.

cgf

--
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple

