Message-ID: <501C2E54.6080603@cornell.edu>
Date: Fri, 03 Aug 2012 16:02:28 -0400
From: Ken Brown <kbrown@cornell.edu>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:12.0) Gecko/20120428 Thunderbird/12.0.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: cygwin@cygwin.com
Subject: Re: crash on latest cygwin snapshot
References: <20120801122902.GC17949@calimero.vinschen.de> <50192522.4090507@cornell.edu> <20120801125834.GH17949@calimero.vinschen.de> <501A946A.2030102@cornell.edu> <87zk6dcgfg.fsf@Rainer.invalid> <20120802182129.GA11728@ednor.casa.cgf.cx> <87r4rpcdhx.fsf@Rainer.invalid> <20120802193416.GB11728@ednor.casa.cgf.cx> <501B3FE6.90006@cornell.edu> <20120803034119.GA15831@ednor.casa.cgf.cx> <20120803162146.GA15383@ednor.casa.cgf.cx>
In-Reply-To: <20120803162146.GA15383@ednor.casa.cgf.cx>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help@cygwin.com; run by ezmlm
Sender: cygwin-owner@cygwin.com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin@cygwin.com

On 8/3/2012 12:21 PM, Christopher Faylor wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 02, 2012 at 11:41:19PM -0400, Christopher Faylor wrote:
>> On Thu, Aug 02, 2012 at 11:05:10PM -0400, Ken Brown wrote:
>>> On 8/2/2012 3:34 PM, Christopher Faylor wrote:
>>>> On Thu, Aug 02, 2012 at 09:14:50PM +0200, Achim Gratz wrote:
>>>>> Christopher Faylor writes:
>>>>>> Just to be clear: Is this with the recent snapshot?
>>>>>
>>>>> Yes, this is with the 2012-08-01 snapshot.
>>>>>
>>>>>> I ask because one other "I see something similar" seemed to come from
>>>>>> 1.7.16.
>>>>>
>>>>> I'm almost always running a snapshot, but I can back it out to vanilla
>>>>> Cygwin or any other snapshot if it helps finding the error.  I don't
>>>>> think I've had any other updates except mesa inbetween switching from
>>>>> the snapshot I used before and the current one ???  but that is
>>>>> circumstancial evidence only.
>>>>
>>>> It would be interesting to see if you or Ken have a problem with the
>>>> 20120730 snapshot.
>>>>
>>>> And, if so, then an strace would probably be useful, although it would
>>>> be huge.  If you do get one, let me know how to download it or I can
>>>> provide temporary storage somewhere.
>>>
>>> I do have the same problem with the 20120730 snapshot.  I started emacs
>>> in an xterm window, attached strace, and walked away.  This time it
>>> didn't take long for emacs to crash, so the strace output isn't huge:
>>>
>>> wget http://sanibeltranquility.com/cygwin/strace.out
>>
>> Thanks.  I think I see the problem but I won't be able to get to it
>> tonight.
>>
>> It's in the new signal handling code.
>
> I was actually able to duplicate this fairly easy.  It took me too long
> to realize that I had to run the X version of emacs, when that should
> have been obvious from the strace.
>
> I have uploaded a new snapshot which should fix the problem.
>
> Can you confirm Ken?

I'm testing.  It looks good so far, but I'd like to get emacs running 
without a crash for 24 hours before I'm confident.  I'll report back 
tomorrow.

I'm also testing to see if the recent changes have fixed the problem 
that I was struggling with in 
http://cygwin.com/ml/cygwin-xfree/2012-04/msg00048.html .  That also 
looks good so far.

Ken


--
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple