X-Recipient: archive-cygwin@delorie.com
X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.3 required=5.0	tests=AWL,BAYES_00,KHOP_THREADED,SPF_NEUTRAL,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD
X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
Message-ID: <501B3FE6.90006@cornell.edu>
Date: Thu, 02 Aug 2012 23:05:10 -0400
From: Ken Brown <kbrown@cornell.edu>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:14.0) Gecko/20120713 Thunderbird/14.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: cygwin@cygwin.com
Subject: Re: crash on latest cygwin snapshot
References: <4FF1B37A.4000902@gmail.com> <20120801094311.GE18636@calimero.vinschen.de> <50190645.2050209@gmail.com> <20120801122902.GC17949@calimero.vinschen.de> <50192522.4090507@cornell.edu> <20120801125834.GH17949@calimero.vinschen.de> <501A946A.2030102@cornell.edu> <87zk6dcgfg.fsf@Rainer.invalid> <20120802182129.GA11728@ednor.casa.cgf.cx> <87r4rpcdhx.fsf@Rainer.invalid> <20120802193416.GB11728@ednor.casa.cgf.cx>
In-Reply-To: <20120802193416.GB11728@ednor.casa.cgf.cx>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-PMX-CORNELL-SPAM-CHECKED: Pawpaw
X-Original-Sender: kbrown@cornell.edu - Thu Aug  2 23:05:18 2012
X-PMX-CORNELL-REASON: CU_White_List_Override
X-IsSubscribed: yes
Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help@cygwin.com; run by ezmlm
List-Id: <cygwin.cygwin.com>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-subscribe@cygwin.com>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin@cygwin.com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-help@cygwin.com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-owner@cygwin.com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin@cygwin.com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin@cygwin.com

On 8/2/2012 3:34 PM, Christopher Faylor wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 02, 2012 at 09:14:50PM +0200, Achim Gratz wrote:
>> Christopher Faylor writes:
>>> Just to be clear: Is this with the recent snapshot?
>>
>> Yes, this is with the 2012-08-01 snapshot.
>>
>>> I ask because one other "I see something similar" seemed to come from
>>> 1.7.16.
>>
>> I'm almost always running a snapshot, but I can back it out to vanilla
>> Cygwin or any other snapshot if it helps finding the error.  I don't
>> think I've had any other updates except mesa inbetween switching from
>> the snapshot I used before and the current one ??? but that is
>> circumstancial evidence only.
>
> It would be interesting to see if you or Ken have a problem with the
> 20120730 snapshot.
>
> And, if so, then an strace would probably be useful, although it would
> be huge.  If you do get one, let me know how to download it or I can
> provide temporary storage somewhere.

I do have the same problem with the 20120730 snapshot.  I started emacs 
in an xterm window, attached strace, and walked away.  This time it 
didn't take long for emacs to crash, so the strace output isn't huge:

wget http://sanibeltranquility.com/cygwin/strace.out

Ken


--
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple

