X-Recipient: archive-cygwin@delorie.com
X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-4.3 required=5.0	tests=AWL,BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,FREEMAIL_FROM,KHOP_RCVD_TRUST,KHOP_THREADED,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,RCVD_IN_HOSTKARMA_YE,TW_CG
X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <20120720174819.GA2064@ednor.casa.cgf.cx>
References: <CAO73BAA6GiKkH8rTRZHbTYQfxFUPhjgxi3NMZJmZs2iQs=Qo2g@mail.gmail.com>	<20120720170423.GA850@ednor.casa.cgf.cx>	<CAO73BADvHgqUsALirOz-bNgQJG9Xsa_u7bQHg5BuRRD7x-3dRA@mail.gmail.com>	<20120720174819.GA2064@ednor.casa.cgf.cx>
Date: Fri, 20 Jul 2012 14:12:55 -0400
Message-ID: <CAO73BADVdY-+Yj55Nsn=WsT2Fqr9XvSr6tQr9f+Yht++xUQKXQ@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: rebaseall invocation error
From: Mirko Vukovic <mirko.vukovic@gmail.com>
To: cygwin@cygwin.com
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
X-IsSubscribed: yes
Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help@cygwin.com; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <cygwin.cygwin.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:cygwin-unsubscribe-archive-cygwin=delorie.com@cygwin.com>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-subscribe@cygwin.com>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin@cygwin.com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-help@cygwin.com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-owner@cygwin.com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin@cygwin.com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin@cygwin.com

On Fri, Jul 20, 2012 at 1:48 PM, Christopher Faylor  wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 20, 2012 at 01:36:07PM -0400, Mirko Vukovic wrote:
>>Problem fixed ... see below
>>
>>On Fri, Jul 20, 2012 at 1:04 PM, Christopher Faylor
>><email deleted> wrote:
>>> On Fri, Jul 20, 2012 at 01:00:45PM -0400, Mirko Vukovic wrote:
>>>>Hello,
>>>>
>>>>I am running rebaseall manually to enable X11:  I found a post
>>>>suggesting to rebase to 0x77000000
>>>>
>>>>I am following instructions on http://cygwin.wikia.com/wiki/Rebaseall
>>>
>>> You realize that the project web site is: http://cygwin.com/ right?  You
>>> can't expect instructions from unrelated sites to work.  You shouldn't
>>> need to use the above anymore with new improvements to reabase.
>>
>>True.  But I did not find anything else better and the instructions on
>>that site jibed with what I read on the cygwin mailing list over the
>>years.  That's why I went with it.
>
> But this wasn't actually "better".  Just running rebaseall, as suggested
> by the official Cygwin FAQ is the correct advice.
>

I agree

> cgf
>
> --
> Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
> FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/
> Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
> Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
>

--
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple