X-Recipient: archive-cygwin@delorie.com X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Date: Thu, 12 Jul 2012 18:14:21 +0200 From: Corinna Vinschen To: cygwin@cygwin.com Subject: Re: perl-5.14.2 switch Message-ID: <20120712161421.GC3406@calimero.vinschen.de> Reply-To: cygwin@cygwin.com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin@cygwin.com References: <87mx36z0yo.fsf@Rainer.invalid> <7FA8477365204CA6B4617E7279967C24@multiplay.co.uk> <87a9z6ywvp.fsf@Rainer.invalid> <60B4845A414A4F228982AB4DEAF4D4FE@multiplay.co.uk> <87pq81d09k.fsf@Rainer.invalid> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help@cygwin.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner@cygwin.com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin@cygwin.com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin@cygwin.com On Jul 12 10:24, Reini Urban wrote: > Well, I'm not so happy with threads. They seem to be more broken than with 5.10. > But I like 5.14.2 generally at most of all also, much better than the > completely flawed 5.16. Is this thread problem something Cygwin-specific, a Cygwin bug perhaps? If so, can you nail that down into a simple C testcase? Corinna -- Corinna Vinschen Please, send mails regarding Cygwin to Cygwin Project Co-Leader cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Red Hat -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple