Message-ID: <4FBF5AE4.20305@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 25 May 2012 12:11:48 +0200
From: Noel Grandin <noelgrandin@gmail.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:12.0) Gecko/20120428 Thunderbird/12.0.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: cygwin@cygwin.com
Subject: Re: "emacs -nw" hangs in a terminal
References: <4FBA8EA0.4040905@cornell.edu> <20120522112828.GA9200@calimero.vinschen.de> <4FBB7BA6.9000409@cornell.edu> <20120522134119.GB9200@calimero.vinschen.de> <20120522134932.GC9200@calimero.vinschen.de> <4FBCD166.8080101@cornell.edu> <20120523141538.GI9200@calimero.vinschen.de> <4FBD08B0.50209@cornell.edu> <20120523160235.GK9200@calimero.vinschen.de> <4FBE26C8.1000008@cornell.edu> <20120525100321.GF4225@calimero.vinschen.de>
In-Reply-To: <20120525100321.GF4225@calimero.vinschen.de>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help@cygwin.com; run by ezmlm
Sender: cygwin-owner@cygwin.com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin@cygwin.com


On 2012-05-25 12:03, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
> I'll look further into this, but I am wondering about this: Is the new
> Fsignal/Fthrow implementation so much different than the old one in
> emacs 23.x? If not, why does it work in 23.x? Any chance 24.x produces
> a stack or heap corruption? Double free or something? And then again,
> do we know if 24.x works on older Cygwin release or snapshots? If it's
> a Cygwin problem, it might help to nail it down. Corinna

Might be worth running it under Dr Memory to check this.
http://www.drmemory.org/

--
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple