X-Recipient: archive-cygwin@delorie.com X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=3.7 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,BOTNET,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,RCVD_IN_HOSTKARMA_NO,RCVD_IN_HOSTKARMA_YE,SPF_SOFTFAIL X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Date: Thu, 03 May 2012 08:46:03 -0400 From: Jason Tishler To: cygwin@cygwin.com Subject: Re: [Bug] rebaseall Message-id: <20120503124602.GA2844@tishler.net> Mail-followup-to: cygwin@cygwin.com References: <20120503075119.GG3031@calimero.vinschen.de> MIME-version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-disposition: inline In-reply-to: <20120503075119.GG3031@calimero.vinschen.de> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help@cygwin.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner@cygwin.com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin@cygwin.com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin@cygwin.com On Thu, May 03, 2012 at 09:51:19AM +0200, Corinna Vinschen wrote: > On May 3 06:59, Achim Gratz wrote: > > In addition, there should be a "picket fence" in front of those > > expression(s), too. Otherwise they match other lines that are not > > supposed to be deleted (the DLL lines are probably safe, but could > > be changed defensively as well). > > Sounds good to me. > > Jason, I would suggest the following patch to apply to the next rebase > release, courtesy Achim: > > [snip] OK, but how about using sed's -r option instead of escaping the question marks? Thanks, Jason -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple