X-Recipient: archive-cygwin@delorie.com
X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.7 required=5.0	tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,RCVD_IN_HOSTKARMA_YE
X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
X-Mail-Handler: MailHop Outbound by DynDNS
X-Report-Abuse-To: abuse@dyndns.com (see http://www.dyndns.com/services/mailhop/outbound_abuse.html for abuse reporting information)
X-MHO-User: U2FsdGVkX19FHviJrWxQio06XNFXscYh
Date: Sat, 28 Apr 2012 16:50:29 -0400
From: Christopher Faylor <cgf-use-the-mailinglist-please@cygwin.com>
To: cygwin@cygwin.com
Subject: Using Red Hat digital signing on setup.exe (was Re: Cygwin 1.7.14-2 setup.exe v2.772 broken?)
Message-ID: <20120428205029.GB20709@ednor.casa.cgf.cx>
Reply-To: cygwin@cygwin.com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin@cygwin.com
References: <4F9B1EF7.1080501@comcast.net> <4F9B6DC1.3030303@gmail.com> <4F9B77B1.9070200@gmail.com> <4F9C22B1.5000405@comcast.net> <20120428180621.GA23030@calimero.vinschen.de> <CADSoG1tUY2BXCsU2UcnrgFPAg9KXFn2N5J4zcoi_MVJUQwb0Aw@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <CADSoG1tUY2BXCsU2UcnrgFPAg9KXFn2N5J4zcoi_MVJUQwb0Aw@mail.gmail.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14)
Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help@cygwin.com; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <cygwin.cygwin.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:cygwin-unsubscribe-archive-cygwin=delorie.com@cygwin.com>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-subscribe@cygwin.com>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin@cygwin.com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-help@cygwin.com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-owner@cygwin.com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin@cygwin.com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin@cygwin.com

It's bad etiquette to derail an email thread with unrelated questions.

On Sat, Apr 28, 2012 at 07:22:29PM +0100, Nick Lowe wrote:
>Is there a reason why the Cygwin executables, and certainly the
>installer, are not digitally signed by Redhat?

setup.exe is not produced by Red Hat and the Cygwin project at
cygwin.com is not a Red Hat project.  So, the logicstics of doing this
aside, I doubt that Red Hat would be too keen on the idea.

cgf

--
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple

