X-Recipient: archive-cygwin@delorie.com X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.1 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,KHOP_THREADED,NIXSPAM_IXHASH,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-class: urn:content-classes:message Subject: RE: cygwin 1.7.13-1: can't execute shell scripts on samba share Date: Mon, 23 Apr 2012 14:26:27 +0200 Message-ID: <6BFA9AF2C7556E42AFF3F187ECAB07B802F9CFDC@bespdc01.mediaxim.local> In-Reply-To: <20120423115331.GD7097@calimero.vinschen.de> References: <1E3D6F97-F938-420C-A5F7-C6446EC27F32@intersystems.com> <1883CD3D-75CE-4289-A5F9-317DE2ED7F28@intersystems.com> <6BFA9AF2C7556E42AFF3F187ECAB07B802F9CFCB@bespdc01.mediaxim.local> <20120423115331.GD7097@calimero.vinschen.de> From: "Michel Bardiaux" To: X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help@cygwin.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner@cygwin.com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin@cygwin.com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin@cygwin.com Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-MIME-Autoconverted: from base64 to 8bit by delorie.com id q3NCRBPQ015960 [snip] > You could mount the samba share with "noacl", > see http://cygwin.com/cygwin-ug-net/using.html#mount-table > Corinna Thanks for the suggestion. I have added this to /etc/fstab: Y: /cygdrive/y smbfs binary,noacl,auto 0 0 Closed all cygwin windows, reopened one (mintty), mount says: C:/cygwin/bin on /usr/bin type ntfs (binary,auto) C:/cygwin/lib on /usr/lib type ntfs (binary,auto) C:/cygwin on / type ntfs (binary,auto) Y: on /cygdrive/y type smbfs (binary,noacl) C: on /cygdrive/c type ntfs (binary,posix=0,user,noumount,auto) Z: on /cygdrive/z type smbfs (binary,posix=0,user,noumount,auto) created (again...) len.sh on the samba drive, and again: $ getfacl len.sh # file: len.sh # owner: ???????? # group: ???????? user::rwx group::rw- mask:rwx other:r-- Curiouser and curiouser: the file begins with #!, hence with noacl it should be executable by anyone, right? But I still have permission denied, unless I chmod 777. BTW: I am now playing around with execute mode and samba drives to help solve the OP's problem, maybe find a bug. I actually use cygwin with ssh, scp, svn, etc. so that I do *not* have to cope with the idiosyncrasies of multiple security layers: windows + samba + linux. So, adding a 4th one is akin to masochism! Greetings, (s) M. Bardiaux