X-Recipient: archive-cygwin@delorie.com X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.4 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,RCVD_IN_HOSTKARMA_YE,TW_GC,TW_YG X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Message-ID: From: Me Myself and I To: Subject: CLASSPATHS, and static inclusion. Date: Wed, 4 Apr 2012 12:32:04 +1030 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" MIME-Version: 1.0 X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help@cygwin.com; run by ezmlm List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner@cygwin.com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin@cygwin.com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin@cygwin.com Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-MIME-Autoconverted: from quoted-printable to 8bit by delorie.com id q3422OHR004290 I have managed to get a copy of ecj.jar -I havn't been able to follow the instructions for cygpath very well. Is there a CLASSPATH=$CLASSPATH:"/a/b/c/d"; sort of statement I can just put in /etc/profile  , that won't leave any problems for my compiled program (presumably my import statement classes get put in my final gcj program)?  Could I have an example? -As an aside, when it comes to classes in external packages in external (non-default) jar files, does one usually have dynamic linking from the gcj compiled program to the seperate package jar file (needed at runtime), or static linking where the seperate jar necessary classes and related are all physically included inside the gcj compiled program? If I only want static linking of those seperate jar classes (physical inclusion), may I get away with a CLASSPATH statement only? -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple