X-Recipient: archive-cygwin@delorie.com X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Date: Wed, 28 Mar 2012 09:33:10 +0200 From: Corinna Vinschen To: cygwin@cygwin.com Subject: Re: [ANNOUNCEMENT] Updated: rebase-4.1.0-1 Message-ID: <20120328073310.GD25716@calimero.vinschen.de> Reply-To: cygwin@cygwin.com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin@cygwin.com References: <4F712CFC.9050603@cs.utoronto.ca> <20120327083621.GA30721@calimero.vinschen.de> <4F724CD6.8020600@users.sourceforge.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4F724CD6.8020600@users.sourceforge.net> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help@cygwin.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner@cygwin.com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin@cygwin.com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin@cygwin.com On Mar 28 07:27, JonY wrote: > On 3/27/2012 16:36, Corinna Vinschen wrote: > > On Mar 26 22:59, Ryan Johnson wrote: > >> On 26/03/2012 9:40 PM, Jason Tishler wrote: > >>> New News: > >>> === ==== > >>> I have updated the version of rebase to 4.1.0-1. The tarballs should be > >>> available on a Cygwin mirror near you shortly. > >>> > >>> The following are the changes since the previous release: > >>> > >>> * Add rebase/rebaseall touch file (i.e., -t option) support. > >>> > >>> * Add rebaseall setup (i.e., -p option) support. > >>> > >>> * Add .oct to the default rebaseall suffix list. > >> I've been meaning to ask... but maybe the above-mentioned -p flag > >> obsoletes it now: What's the most efficient way to rebase after > >> running setup? We've had the rebase db for a while now, so running > >> rebaseall seems like overkill. Only the newly downloaded dlls need > > > > Now that the new rebase is out, I'm going to create an _autorebase > > package which will automatically call rebaseall at the end of a > > successful run of setup, if that run also updated existing DLLs or > > came with new DLLs. > > If I don't want it to run? I've never had any need to rebase DLLs on my > Win7 64bit machine. It doesn't hurt either. Corinna -- Corinna Vinschen Please, send mails regarding Cygwin to Cygwin Project Co-Leader cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Red Hat -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple