X-Recipient: archive-cygwin@delorie.com
X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.6 required=5.0	tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW
X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
Message-ID: <4F724CD6.8020600@users.sourceforge.net>
Date: Wed, 28 Mar 2012 07:27:18 +0800
From: JonY <jon_y@users.sourceforge.net>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.8.1.12) Gecko/20080213 Thunderbird/2.0.0.12 Mnenhy/0.7.5.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: cygwin@cygwin.com
Subject: Re: [ANNOUNCEMENT] Updated: rebase-4.1.0-1
References: <announce.20120327014025.GA3344@tishler.net> <4F712CFC.9050603@cs.utoronto.ca> <20120327083621.GA30721@calimero.vinschen.de>
In-Reply-To: <20120327083621.GA30721@calimero.vinschen.de>
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="------------enig1FB0D606FE2D492A5CF492B9"
X-IsSubscribed: yes
Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help@cygwin.com; run by ezmlm
List-Id: <cygwin.cygwin.com>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-subscribe@cygwin.com>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin@cygwin.com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-help@cygwin.com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-owner@cygwin.com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin@cygwin.com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin@cygwin.com

--------------enig1FB0D606FE2D492A5CF492B9
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On 3/27/2012 16:36, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
> On Mar 26 22:59, Ryan Johnson wrote:
>> On 26/03/2012 9:40 PM, Jason Tishler wrote:
>>> New News:
>>> =3D=3D=3D =3D=3D=3D=3D
>>> I have updated the version of rebase to 4.1.0-1.  The tarballs should be
>>> available on a Cygwin mirror near you shortly.
>>>
>>> The following are the changes since the previous release:
>>>
>>>     * Add rebase/rebaseall touch file (i.e., -t option) support.
>>>
>>>     * Add rebaseall setup (i.e., -p option) support.
>>>
>>>     * Add .oct to the default rebaseall suffix list.
>> I've been meaning to ask... but maybe the above-mentioned -p flag
>> obsoletes it now: What's the most efficient way to rebase after
>> running setup? We've had the rebase db for a while now, so running
>> rebaseall seems like overkill. Only the newly downloaded dlls need
>=20
> Now that the new rebase is out, I'm going to create an _autorebase
> package which will automatically call rebaseall at the end of a
> successful run of setup, if that run also updated existing DLLs or
> came with new DLLs.

If I don't want it to run? I've never had any need to rebase DLLs on my
Win7 64bit machine.


--------------enig1FB0D606FE2D492A5CF492B9
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc"

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.17 (MingW32)

iEYEARECAAYFAk9yTPcACgkQp56AKe10wHdPjQCeKJiaZGttYLt0fe1MMwiFywGt
Mc4AnjpGWe76lmmUAN8yzxAmRF+apsBO
=F5At
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--------------enig1FB0D606FE2D492A5CF492B9--
