X-Recipient: archive-cygwin@delorie.com X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Date: Mon, 26 Mar 2012 12:21:11 +0200 From: Corinna Vinschen To: cygwin@cygwin.com Subject: Re: du crashes if .lnk symlink and a folder it points to are named the same, differing only in letter case Message-ID: <20120326102111.GM2425@calimero.vinschen.de> Reply-To: cygwin@cygwin.com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin@cygwin.com References: <304827643.20120325123534@gmail.com> <4F6FB87E.8050109@tlinx.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4F6FB87E.8050109@tlinx.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help@cygwin.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner@cygwin.com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin@cygwin.com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin@cygwin.com On Mar 25 17:29, Linda Walsh wrote: > Ilya Basin wrote: > > >I needed that because one git repository has branches named > >"Epam/a" and "epam/b", and git was always creating the "missing" epam > >directory at fetch. > > > >$ ls -l > >total 0 > >drwxr-xr-x+ 1 adminpwd None 0 Mar 25 11:42 Epam > >drwxr-xr-x+ 1 adminpwd None 0 Mar 25 11:42 epam > > > >why no " -> Epam" part? 'ls' behaves funny too, but at least it > >doesn't crash. > > > > > >$ ls -l epam.lnk > >lrwxrwxrwx 1 Users None 4 Mar 13 16:43 epam.lnk -> Epam > > > >$ du . > >0 ./Epam > >Aborted (core dumped) > > ===== > You might try setting going into system properties, advanced, > Environment Variables and creating an entry (or adding to the > original if there is one there already) for CYGWIN. Entries to have > in it:\ > winsymlinks export #(+opt) [nodosfilewarning] This problem has nothing to do with dosfilewarning. > I have a feeling you are seeing probs related to the cygwin hard link emulation > which can by turned off by telling it to use winsymlinks (export > tells it to export the value to children processes -- Sigh. This problem has nothing to do with hardlinks. And it has nothing to do with the winsymlinks option, unless you count in the fact that the symlink in question is a .lnk style symlink. And the winsymlink option has nothing to do with hardlinks at all. There's a reason the option is called winsymlink, not winhardlinks. Corinna -- Corinna Vinschen Please, send mails regarding Cygwin to Cygwin Project Co-Leader cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Red Hat -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple