X-Recipient: archive-cygwin@delorie.com
X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.7 required=5.0	tests=AWL,BAYES_00,SPF_NEUTRAL
X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
Message-ID: <4F575A90.8060201@cs.utoronto.ca>
Date: Wed, 07 Mar 2012 07:54:40 -0500
From: Ryan Johnson <ryan.johnson@cs.utoronto.ca>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:10.0.2) Gecko/20120216 Thunderbird/10.0.2
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: "cygwin@cygwin.com" <cygwin@cygwin.com>
Subject: gcc-4.7.0-RC-20120302 fails to build for i686-pc-cygwin
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-IsSubscribed: yes
Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help@cygwin.com; run by ezmlm
List-Id: <cygwin.cygwin.com>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-subscribe@cygwin.com>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin@cygwin.com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-help@cygwin.com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-owner@cygwin.com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin@cygwin.com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin@cygwin.com

Hi all,

I tried to bootstrap the gcc-4.7 RC and it fails because it expects to 
find <process.h> and the file actually lives in <cygwin/process.h> (see 
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52513).

I'm asking here because the gcc devs thought this would mean 4.6 is 
broken as well, but I have 4.6.2 running. Did process.h perhaps move 
between 1.7.10 and 1.7.11? I guess configure must be using linker rather 
than preprocessor tests for presence of spawnve, because it thinks 
(correctly) that the function exists.

Thanks!
Ryan


--
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple