X-Recipient: archive-cygwin@delorie.com X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.6 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Date: Mon, 5 Mar 2012 08:09:03 +0100 From: Denis Excoffier To: cygwin@cygwin.com Subject: Re: cygwin-1.7.10-1 fork - address space needed by ... already in use Message-ID: <20120305070927.GA2396@qp9482> References: <33279157.post@talk.nabble.com> <20120207154359.GA2952@qp9482> <20120207161428.GB12159@calimero.vinschen.de> <4F31559B.6060600@cs.utoronto.ca> <20120208090824.GA1724@qp9482> <20120208092711.GF25129@calimero.vinschen.de> <20120208102235.GA2796@qp9482> <20120304172210.GI18852@calimero.vinschen.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20120304172210.GI18852@calimero.vinschen.de> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help@cygwin.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner@cygwin.com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin@cygwin.com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin@cygwin.com On Sun, Mar 04, 2012 at 06:22:10PM +0100, Corinna Vinschen wrote: >> On Feb 8 11:22, Denis Excoffier wrote: >> > On Wed, Feb 08, 2012 at 10:27:11AM +0100, Corinna Vinschen wrote: >> > >> On Feb 8 10:08, Denis Excoffier wrote: >> > >> > Result is: >> > >> > >> > >> > 1 [main] gcc-4 4084 dll_list::reserve_space: address space needed by 'cygiconv-2.dll' (0x674C0000 with type 1=DLL_LINK) is perhaps already occupied >> > >> > 1720 [main] gcc-4 4084 dll_list::reserve_space: address space needed by 'cygintl-8.dll' (0x6F5C0000 with type 1=DLL_LINK) is perhaps already occupied >> > >> > 2085 [main] gcc-4 4084 dll_list::reserve_space: address space needed by 'cygiconv-2.dll' (0x674C0000 with type 2=DLL_LOAD) is perhaps already occupied >> > >> > 2440 [main] gcc-4 4084 dll_list::reserve_space: address space needed by 'cygintl-8.dll' (0x6F5C0000 with type 2=DLL_LOAD) is perhaps already occupied >> >> Denis, can you please give the latest snapshot DLL a try in all >> circumstances in which you saw the above kind of fork problems in >> 1.7.10? I applied a patch which should now work out the differences >> between linked and loaded DLLs better than before. >> % uname -a CYGWIN_NT-5.1 edited 1.7.12s(0.260/5/3) 20120304 17:49:39 i686 Cygwin % I am now unable to report any problem of that sort. I have compiled the cygwin1.dll, the new gcc-4.7.0-rc-20120302, and several other packages with no occurrence of such a message. I've only to report that i observe some time to time the "something failed for pid" message (see several instances below). "Win32 Error 5" is ERROR_ACCESS_DENIED i suppose (in winerrors.h). I don't know what we are expected to do with these. In addition, they do not seem to hurt much. Also i've to say that i've installed the CYGWIN=detect_bloda and nothing has shown up (still). Regards, Denis Excoffier. 947 [main] sh 660! _pinfo::dup_proc_pipe: something failed for pid 0: res 660, hProcess 0x6C8, wr_proc_pipe 0x758 vs. 0x758, Win32 error 5 2 [main] sh 3360! _pinfo::dup_proc_pipe: something failed for pid 0: res 3360, hProcess 0x6BC, wr_proc_pipe 0x758 vs. 0x758, Win32 error 5 1345 [main] sh 3772! _pinfo::dup_proc_pipe: something failed for pid 0: res 3772, hProcess 0x6CC, wr_proc_pipe 0x758 vs. 0x758, Win32 error 5 2 [main] sh 792! _pinfo::dup_proc_pipe: something failed for pid 0: res 792, hProcess 0x6D0, wr_proc_pipe 0x75C vs. 0x75C, Win32 error 5 1 [main] sh 3328! _pinfo::dup_proc_pipe: something failed for pid 0: res 3328, hProcess 0x6BC, wr_proc_pipe 0x758 vs. 0x758, Win32 error 5 1 [main] sh 1980! _pinfo::dup_proc_pipe: something failed for pid 0: res 1980, hProcess 0x6BC, wr_proc_pipe 0x74C vs. 0x74C, Win32 error 5 1 [main] sh 628! _pinfo::dup_proc_pipe: something failed for pid 0: res 628, hProcess 0x6BC, wr_proc_pipe 0x758 vs. 0x758, Win32 error 5 1 [main] sh 856! _pinfo::dup_proc_pipe: something failed for pid 0: res 856, hProcess 0x6BC, wr_proc_pipe 0x758 vs. 0x758, Win32 error 5 1 [main] tcsh 3300! _pinfo::dup_proc_pipe: something failed for pid 0: res 3300, hProcess 0x6F0, wr_proc_pipe 0x768 vs. 0x768, Win32 error 5 >> >> Thanks, >> Corinna >> >> -- >> Corinna Vinschen Please, send mails regarding Cygwin to >> Cygwin Project Co-Leader cygwin AT cygwin DOT com >> Red Hat >> >> -- >> Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html >> FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ >> Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html >> Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple