X-Recipient: archive-cygwin@delorie.com
X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.0 required=5.0	tests=AWL,BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED,FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,T_DKIM_INVALID
X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
X-Yahoo-SMTP: QDdxPgyswBCK2bx7SNYDilAqkd6GnSZOMbWnqiDrvOLygeouYdY-
Message-ID: <4F51A0E0.3070606@bellsouth.net>
Date: Fri, 02 Mar 2012 22:41:04 -0600
From: Robert Miles <robertmiles@bellsouth.net>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.0; WOW64; rv:10.0.2) Gecko/20120216 Thunderbird/10.0.2
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: cygwin@cygwin.com
CC: "Matt Seitz \(matseitz\)" <matseitz@cisco.com>
Subject: Re: Recent upgrade to wish leads to a problem
References: <87pqcwoy16.fsf@Rainer.invalid> <70952A932255A2489522275A628B97C3129F5128@xmb-sjc-233.amer.cisco.com>
In-Reply-To: <70952A932255A2489522275A628B97C3129F5128@xmb-sjc-233.amer.cisco.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-IsSubscribed: yes
Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help@cygwin.com; run by ezmlm
List-Id: <cygwin.cygwin.com>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-subscribe@cygwin.com>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin@cygwin.com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-help@cygwin.com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-owner@cygwin.com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin@cygwin.com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin@cygwin.com

On 3/2/2012 1:02 PM, Matt Seitz (matseitz) wrote:
>> From: Achim Gratz [mailto:Stromeko@nexgo.de]
>>
>> I do and FTR: I don't want the cygwin Xorg server to be a dependency
> to
>> all programs that might use X because that would pull in a lot of
>> packages that I have no use for on most systems.
> Right, that would be a disadvantage of making "xinit" a dependency.
>
> My questions are:
>
> 1.  How many people would need to install "xinit"?  How many people
> would not need to install "xinit"?
>
> 2.  How much of an inconvenience would installing "xinit" present to
> people who don't actually need it?
>
> 3.  Is there some way to make both groups happy?  For example, could we
> have a "gitk+xinit" package to give people a clue that they might want
> both (keeping the existing "gitk" package for people who don't need
> "xinit")?
>
Would it be adequate to make the installation procedure direct the user 
to read
a text file describing anything that is SOMETIMES needed, and where to find
packages to provide it, and where to find similar text files describing 
any startup
procedures needed?

--
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple

