X-Recipient: archive-cygwin@delorie.com
X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-12.3 required=5.0	tests=AWL,BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD,USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL
X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AgEFAMAdUU+rRDoG/2dsb2JhbABDhT+uD3iBB4F9AQEBAwEBAg8BEA0ENxMLAgEIFQUCBgYXAQICAgEBJh4RAQEEEwgah18EAQugegGMZYo7BIEvjR8zYwSIUIpJlTs
Content-class: urn:content-classes:message
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;	charset="UTF-8"
Subject: RE: New package: openjpeg-1.5.0-1
Date: Fri, 2 Mar 2012 11:24:43 -0800
Message-ID: <70952A932255A2489522275A628B97C3129F514D@xmb-sjc-233.amer.cisco.com>
In-Reply-To: <4F505942.4040100@cisra.canon.com.au>
References: <4F505942.4040100@cisra.canon.com.au>
From: "Matt Seitz (matseitz)" <matseitz@cisco.com>
To: "The Cygwin Mailing List" <cygwin@cygwin.com>
X-IsSubscribed: yes
Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help@cygwin.com; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <cygwin.cygwin.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:cygwin-unsubscribe-archive-cygwin=delorie.com@cygwin.com>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-subscribe@cygwin.com>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin@cygwin.com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-help@cygwin.com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-owner@cygwin.com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin@cygwin.com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin@cygwin.com
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-MIME-Autoconverted: from base64 to 8bit by delorie.com id q22JPNHu006608

> From: Luke Kendall [mailto:luke.kendall@cisra.canon.com.au]
>
> I'm no expert, but I thought any JPEG 2000 implementation required use
> of patented technologies.  Do the implementers make some statement about
> the patent situation for openjpeg?

Does this help?

https://lists.secondlife.com/pipermail/sldev/2007-February/000340.html

I found this by using:

https://encrypted.google.com/search?q=openjpeg+patent