X-Recipient: archive-cygwin@delorie.com X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Date: Wed, 29 Feb 2012 10:46:55 +0100 From: Corinna Vinschen To: cygwin@cygwin.com Subject: Re: Recent upgrade to wish leads to a problem Message-ID: <20120229094655.GR23440@calimero.vinschen.de> Reply-To: cygwin@cygwin.com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin@cygwin.com References: <4F4DE0B2.7000001@bonhard.uklinux.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help@cygwin.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner@cygwin.com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin@cygwin.com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin@cygwin.com On Feb 29 09:41, Henry S. Thompson wrote: > Fergus writes: > > > Q2 In some other contexts Cygwin provides "nox" versions additionally > > to versions requiring a running X server. Is there any chance that > > tcl-tk-8.4 could be recovered and offered as a nox version? > > +1 > > Please! If you manage to do it so that it does in NO way collide with the new release, then there's nothing speaking against it. Just none of the existing maintainers is interested in maintaining it. http://cygwin.com/acronyms/#SHTDI http://cygwin.com/setup.html Corinna -- Corinna Vinschen Please, send mails regarding Cygwin to Cygwin Project Co-Leader cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Red Hat -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple