Date: Thu, 16 Feb 2012 17:04:58 +0100
From: Corinna Vinschen <corinna-cygwin@cygwin.com>
To: cygwin@cygwin.com
Subject: Re: STC for libapr1 failure
Message-ID: <20120216160458.GK19092@calimero.vinschen.de>
Reply-To: cygwin@cygwin.com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin@cygwin.com
References: <20120214182452.GK25918@calimero.vinschen.de> <4F3AD58A.9040106@acm.org> <20120215153851.GQ25918@calimero.vinschen.de> <4F3C09D9.6000406@acm.org> <20120215204521.GB27454@calimero.vinschen.de> <4F3C208B.2060007@acm.org> <20120215212010.GA4183@calimero.vinschen.de> <4F3C2E35.3080308@acm.org> <20120216140932.GI19092@calimero.vinschen.de> <4F3D2748.8080205@acm.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <4F3D2748.8080205@acm.org>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15)
Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help@cygwin.com; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Sender: cygwin-owner@cygwin.com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin@cygwin.com

On Feb 16 07:56, David Rothenberger wrote:
> On 2/16/2012 6:09 AM, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
> > I read the Linux man page again (http://linux.die.net/man/2/flock)
> > and I just hacked the following testcase, based on your flock STC.
> 
> That sounds pretty close to what the APR test case is doing, as far as I
> understand.
> 
> > The testcase is attached.  I'm pretty curious what your test is actually
> > testing.
> 
> I got to work at my real job all last night, so couldn't extract the STC
> from the APR test suite. But, here's the test in APR-ese in case you're
> interested. I'll remove the APRisms as soon as I can to get you another
> test case.

Thanks,
Corinna

-- 
Corinna Vinschen                  Please, send mails regarding Cygwin to
Cygwin Project Co-Leader          cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Red Hat

--
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple