X-Recipient: archive-cygwin@delorie.com X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.8 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,SPF_HELO_PASS,TW_CG,TW_RX,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org To: cygwin@cygwin.com From: Hans Horn Subject: Re: rxvt broken in recent snapshots (since cygwin 1.7.10(0.259/5/3)) Date: Tue, 14 Feb 2012 22:41:33 -0800 Lines: 24 Message-ID: References: <4F3AE7A4.70505@cwilson.fastmail.fm> <4F3AE81B.5010603@cwilson.fastmail.fm> <20120215013952.GC32195@ednor.casa.cgf.cx> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:10.0.1) Gecko/20120208 Thunderbird/10.0.1 In-Reply-To: <20120215013952.GC32195@ednor.casa.cgf.cx> X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help@cygwin.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner@cygwin.com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin@cygwin.com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin@cygwin.com On 2/14/2012 5:39 PM, Christopher Faylor wrote: > On Tue, Feb 14, 2012 at 06:02:51PM -0500, Charles Wilson wrote: >> On 2/14/2012 6:00 PM, Charles Wilson wrote: >>> On 2/14/2012 1:05 PM, Hans Horn wrote: >>>> something in the recent post-1.7.10(0.259/5/3) cygwin snapshots >>>> (20120207..20120214) broke rxvt. >>> >>> I'll need a few more details than "it broke rxvt". >> >> vis. cgf's reply, never mind... > > If the breakage wasn't so obvious, I would have had the same response. > > But, really, there is no reason to assume that something is so obvious > as to not provide details. *Please* when reporting a problem explain > what the problem actually is. > > cgf > I typically do. In this case: rxvt starts (I see window opening) and then disappears quickly, in other words, it is broken. H. -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple