X-Recipient: archive-cygwin@delorie.com X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Date: Wed, 8 Feb 2012 17:04:23 +0100 From: Corinna Vinschen To: cygwin@cygwin.com Subject: Re: Documentation on -mno-cygwin Accuracy Message-ID: <20120208160423.GP25129@calimero.vinschen.de> Reply-To: cygwin@cygwin.com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin@cygwin.com References: <4F315473.8070106@gmail.com> <4F3180B1.7090007@aol.com> <20120207211251.GF32219@calimero.vinschen.de> <4F31B073.9010501@arlut.utexas.edu> <20120208055848.GC7184@ednor.casa.cgf.cx> <4F3299A6.7090105@arlut.utexas.edu> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4F3299A6.7090105@arlut.utexas.edu> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help@cygwin.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner@cygwin.com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin@cygwin.com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin@cygwin.com On Feb 8 09:49, Jesse Ziser wrote: > On 2/7/2012 11:58 PM, Christopher Faylor wrote: > >The MinGW cross-compiles are not "barely supported". They are included > >in the distribution precisely so that people can build pure-windows > >programs under Cygwin. > > Oh? Then I got the wrong impression from the documentation and the > mailing list when I was trying to work all that out a few years ago. > I can't find it now, but I could swear there was something about it > being "deprecated" or "partially supported" or something. Deprecated was only the -mno-cygwin option for the cygwin gcc. The non-deprecated and much cleaner solution is what we have in the distro now: A full-fledged cross-compiler for the mingw32 target. Corinna -- Corinna Vinschen Please, send mails regarding Cygwin to Cygwin Project Co-Leader cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Red Hat -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple