X-Recipient: archive-cygwin@delorie.com X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.9 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RCVD_NUMERIC_HELO,SPF_HELO_PASS,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org To: cygwin@cygwin.com From: Heiko Elger Subject: Re: find in root (/) results in stack trace Date: Fri, 3 Feb 2012 06:02:09 +0000 (UTC) Lines: 31 Message-ID: References: <20120201150054.GA29431@calimero.vinschen.de> <20120202085645.GB25077@calimero.vinschen.de> <20120202153657.GA18227@calimero.vinschen.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit User-Agent: Loom/3.14 (http://gmane.org/) X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help@cygwin.com; run by ezmlm List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner@cygwin.com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin@cygwin.com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin@cygwin.com Corinna Vinschen <> writes: > > On Feb 2 09:56, Corinna Vinschen wrote: > > I've created a new snapshot 2012-02-02. Can you please test it? AFAICS > I got rid of the memory leak. A recent change broke the fdopendir > handling entirely, apparently. I tested it with a full `find /' scan and > I didn't have any problem... > > ...except that find ran into an infinite loop in /proc/registry. It > turned out that this is a result of registry virtualization under UAC. > I fixed that by treating the affected registry keys(*) as symlink, > rather than as directory. > Hello, thanks a lot. $ uname -a CYGWIN_NT-6.1-WOW64 PCFX061 1.7.10s(0.259/5/3) 20120202 16:59:00 i686 Cygwin I can agree - find is running fine. regards Heiko -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple