X-Recipient: archive-cygwin@delorie.com
X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.8 required=5.0	tests=AWL,BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM,KAM_THEBAT
X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
Date: Wed, 25 Jan 2012 05:06:39 +0400
From: Andrey Repin <anrdaemon@freemail.ru>
Reply-To: Andrey Repin <cygwin@cygwin.com>
Message-ID: <1807862403.20120125050639@mtu-net.ru>
To: Andrew DeFaria <Andrew@DeFaria.com>, cygwin@cygwin.com
Subject: Re: Use of acl on smb related filesystems
In-Reply-To: <jfmrei$3ac$1@dough.gmane.org>
References: <jfl22v$1cr$1@dough.gmane.org> <20120124094739.GI2456@calimero.vinschen.de> <jfmrei$3ac$1@dough.gmane.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-IsSubscribed: yes
Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help@cygwin.com; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <cygwin.cygwin.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:cygwin-unsubscribe-archive-cygwin=delorie.com@cygwin.com>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-subscribe@cygwin.com>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin@cygwin.com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-help@cygwin.com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-owner@cygwin.com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin@cygwin.com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin@cygwin.com

Greetings, Andrew DeFaria!

> On 1/24/2012 1:47 AM, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
>> It's probably because your FS doesn't support ACLs.  Your mount
>> output
>>
>>    //fs-irva-82/adefaria on /home/adefaria type netapp (binary,user)
>>
>> shows that the path points to a NetApp drive.  NetApp drives have
>> various modes.  They can behave like FAT, NTFS, or a POSIX filesystem.
>>  From your other report I assume it's set up not to support ACLs.
>> What does
>>
>>    $ /usr/lib/csih/getVolInfo //fs-irva-82/adefaria
>>
>> print?
> Ltsdo-adefaria:/usr/lib/csih/getVolInfo //fs-irva-82/adefaria
> Device Type        : 7
> Characteristics    : 10
> Volume Name        : <CIFS.HOMEDIR>
> Serial Number      : 0
> Max Filenamelength : 255
> Filesystemname     : <FAT>
> Flags              : 40007
>    FILE_CASE_SENSITIVE_SEARCH  : TRUE
>    FILE_CASE_PRESERVED_NAMES   : TRUE
>    FILE_UNICODE_ON_DISK        : TRUE
>    FILE_PERSISTENT_ACLS        : FALSE
>    FILE_FILE_COMPRESSION       : FALSE
>    FILE_VOLUME_QUOTAS          : FALSE
>    FILE_SUPPORTS_SPARSE_FILES  : FALSE
>    FILE_SUPPORTS_REPARSE_POINTS: FALSE
>    FILE_SUPPORTS_REMOTE_STORAGE: FALSE
>    FILE_VOLUME_IS_COMPRESSED   : FALSE
>    FILE_SUPPORTS_OBJECT_IDS    : FALSE
>    FILE_SUPPORTS_ENCRYPTION    : FALSE
>    FILE_NAMED_STREAMS          : TRUE
>    FILE_READ_ONLY_VOLUME       : FALSE
>    FILE_SEQUENTIAL_WRITE_ONCE  : FALSE
>    FILE_SUPPORTS_TRANSACTIONS  : FALSE

> My guess is that FILE_PERSISTENT_ACLS: FALSE is not a good sign.

Starting from "Filesystemname     : <FAT>" the rest was quite predictable.

> Is this related to this thread: 
> http://old.nabble.com/NetAPP---cygwin-1.7.7-1-avoid-Recycle-BIN-dot-files-td30236482.html?

> In the next reply you advocate me getting a more recent "snapshot". Did 
> you mean a more recent "release"

When one of the head developers says "snapshot", she do mean "snapshot".

> or do you want me to move to "snapshots" (which I assume are sorta like
> betas.

They "sorta like" any quality they are happened to be.
But right now, they are in a state of release candidates for 1.7.10.

> Skimming some of the history (sorry I have a meeting fast approaching) this seems like a
> fairly recent development. Has there been a resolution? (Gotta go, will 
> check back later).


--
WBR,
Andrey Repin (anrdaemon@freemail.ru) 25.01.2012, <05:03>

Sorry for my terrible english...


--
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple