X-Recipient: archive-cygwin@delorie.com X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=3.2 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_50,FREEMAIL_FROM,KAM_THEBAT X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Date: Tue, 24 Jan 2012 12:42:19 +0400 From: Andrey Repin Reply-To: Andrey Repin Message-ID: <369964869.20120124124219@mtu-net.ru> To: Andrew DeFaria , cygwin@cygwin.com Subject: Re: Use of acl on smb related filesystems In-Reply-To: References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help@cygwin.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner@cygwin.com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin@cygwin.com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin@cygwin.com Greetings, Andrew DeFaria! > A mount point for a remote directory without ACL support: > //server/share/subdir /srv/subdir smbfs binary,noacl 0 0 With native ACL support. (Or absence of it.) Flag "noacl" only means that Cygwin will not try to tap the ACL to mimick the Linux/Unix access masks. > Seems odd to specify noacl if acls are not supported anyway. And the > example: > //server/share /mysrv ntfs posix=1,acl 0 0 > none /cygdrive cygdrive posix=0,noacl 0 0 I suggest you do not use Cygwin ACL with network shares. Been giving grief to users long time since. -- WBR, Andrey Repin (anrdaemon@freemail.ru) 24.01.2012, <12:37> Sorry for my terrible english... -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple