X-Recipient: archive-cygwin@delorie.com
X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0	tests=AWL,BAYES_00
X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
X-MDAV-Processed: mail1.multiplay.co.uk, Tue, 10 Jan 2012 18:21:55 +0000
X-Spam-Processed: mail1.multiplay.co.uk, Tue, 10 Jan 2012 18:21:54 +0000
X-MDRemoteIP: 188.220.16.49
X-Return-Path: prvs=135670db80=killing@multiplay.co.uk
X-Envelope-From: killing@multiplay.co.uk
X-MDaemon-Deliver-To: cygwin@cygwin.com
Message-ID: <6E23B1B3BBEF4CFFB88FEB74F1DCF20E@multiplay.co.uk>
From: "Steven Hartland" <killing@multiplay.co.uk>
To: <cygwin@cygwin.com>
References: <95814509-4E08-44C6-8E59-026225EC0FF5@playsafesa.com> <4F04613B.6050505@gmail.com> <B6F87B4D-C088-49BF-B52C-3D0168EAC78D@playsafesa.com> <20120109134311.GH15470@calimero.vinschen.de> <DDBC23AA-2E2B-4DF2-9783-7611AB80C1C8@playsafesa.com> <20120110144556.GG2292@calimero.vinschen.de> <23A68B159C764FB2B048DAD0F256B935@multiplay.co.uk> <20120110162809.GH2292@calimero.vinschen.de> <4C3EE0F960B24B98A01422BB14D4BF33@multiplay.co.uk> <20120110172621.GJ2292@calimero.vinschen.de>
Subject: Re: socket performance (was Re: Building cygwin1.dll)
Date: Tue, 10 Jan 2012 18:21:49 -0000
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;	format=flowed;	charset="UTF-8";	reply-type=original
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-IsSubscribed: yes
Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help@cygwin.com; run by ezmlm
List-Id: <cygwin.cygwin.com>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-subscribe@cygwin.com>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin@cygwin.com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-help@cygwin.com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-owner@cygwin.com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin@cygwin.com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin@cygwin.com

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Corinna Vinschen" 
> Well, the file I downloaded was a self-extracting zip archive and the
> file it contains is called Windows6.1-KB983528-x64.msu, so I'm fairly
> certain it's the right one for an AMD64 system.

Windows6.1-KB983528-x64.msu is the file I have here too so unless
there's something else a play i.e. running as Administrator UAC rubish?

>> If this bug is effecting your you need to ensure that you make no connections
>> using the machine that could possibly trigger the throughput issues prior to
>> testing. Otherwise you'll be using a tcp stack without scaling.
> 
> Sounds tricky.  The laptop is a domain member and it's not in the same
> room with me so I'm running this via rdesktop.  But that would be fixable.
> 
> However, if this issue is the problem, then why is sftp fast and only scp
> and rsync slow?  I can reproduce this at will, not only once in the
> right order.

Hmm that would indeed not be explained by the KB iirc there are some
internal differences between the way sftp and scp transfer data.

Do you have a wireshark dump of the two transfers we could examine?

    Regards
    Steve


--
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple

