X-Recipient: archive-cygwin@delorie.com
X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.2 required=5.0	tests=AWL,BAYES_00,DKIM_ADSP_CUSTOM_MED,FREEMAIL_FROM,NML_ADSP_CUSTOM_MED,RP_MATCHES_RCVD,SPF_HELO_PASS,TW_YG,UNPARSEABLE_RELAY
X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
To: cygwin@cygwin.com
From: Andrew Hancock <andymhancock@gmail.com>
Subject: Understanding versions of apps in cygwin suite
Date: Sat, 3 Dec 2011 04:26:10 +0000 (UTC)
Lines: 5
Message-ID: <loom.20111203T052154-912@post.gmane.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
User-Agent: Loom/3.14 (http://gmane.org/)
X-IsSubscribed: yes
Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help@cygwin.com; run by ezmlm
List-Id: <cygwin.cygwin.com>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-subscribe@cygwin.com>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin@cygwin.com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-help@cygwin.com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-owner@cygwin.com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin@cygwin.com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin@cygwin.com

According to http://savannah.gnu.org/bugs/?func=detailitem&item_id=30309 , a bug
with octave's wavread function was fixed in octave 3.2.3.  My "cygcheck -cvs"
shows an octave of 3.4.2, but I still get the bug.  I was wondering if it is
wise to assume that the app version number from cygcheck is the same as the
version number from the gnu site?


--
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple