X-Recipient: archive-cygwin@delorie.com X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=4.8 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_50,BOTNET,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,TW_YG X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Message-id: <4ECD1C85.80505@cygwin.com> Date: Wed, 23 Nov 2011 11:17:09 -0500 From: "Larry Hall (Cygwin)" Reply-to: cygwin@cygwin.com User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:8.0) Gecko/20111105 Thunderbird/8.0 MIME-version: 1.0 To: cygwin@cygwin.com Subject: Re: cygwin dlls needed to run binutils References: <32874201.post@talk.nabble.com> In-reply-to: <32874201.post@talk.nabble.com> Content-type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help@cygwin.com; run by ezmlm List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner@cygwin.com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin@cygwin.com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin@cygwin.com On 11/23/2011 10:37 AM, Surrounder wrote: > > I compiled binutils within cygwin 1.7.9-1 and was wondering why I not only > need the cygwin1.dll to run them under windows, I also need the cygz.dll and > the cyggcc_s-1.dll > > Last time I compiled only cagwin1.dll was necessary. Anybody knows if I do > sth. wrong or did I miss sth.? > > Thanks for any response. A cygcheck on 'ld' shows cyggcc_s-1.dll is pulled in as a result of a dependency on cygintl-8.dll. I don't see a dependency on cygz.dll but perhaps another tool from the package pulls that one in. -- Larry _____________________________________________________________________ A: Yes. > Q: Are you sure? >> A: Because it reverses the logical flow of conversation. >>> Q: Why is top posting annoying in email? -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple