X-Recipient: archive-cygwin@delorie.com X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.6 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RP_MATCHES_RCVD,TW_SV X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Message-ID: <4EC7772E.7010605@etr-usa.com> Date: Sat, 19 Nov 2011 02:30:22 -0700 From: Warren Young User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.0; WOW64; rv:8.0) Gecko/20111105 Thunderbird/8.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Cygwin-L Subject: Re: Rolling back to 1.6.x Subversion References: <4EC2DDF5.9000403@gmail.com> <4EC3D428.5030605@bopp.net> <17010684424.20111117022022@mtu-net.ru> <4EC55B11.8090602@etr-usa.com> <1286468521.20111118024209@mtu-net.ru> <4EC5A338.9060302@etr-usa.com> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help@cygwin.com; run by ezmlm List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner@cygwin.com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin@cygwin.com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin@cygwin.com On 11/18/2011 7:24 AM, Csaba Raduly wrote: > On 11/18/11, Warren Young wrote: >> >> How about "svn st -q ."? > > That prints nothing if the folder is up to date. Yes. And in the case the OP was concerned with, svn will complain bitterly if the folder isn't versioned. The worst side effect of doing it this way is that svn can be noisy if there's a lot of stuff changed in the folder at the time. -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple