X-Recipient: archive-cygwin@delorie.com X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_50,RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Message-ID: <4EC5A338.9060302@etr-usa.com> Date: Thu, 17 Nov 2011 17:13:44 -0700 From: Warren Young User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.0; WOW64; rv:8.0) Gecko/20111105 Thunderbird/8.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Andrey Repin Subject: Re: Rolling back to 1.6.x Subversion References: <4EC2DDF5.9000403@gmail.com> <4EC3D428.5030605@bopp.net> <17010684424.20111117022022@mtu-net.ru> <4EC55B11.8090602@etr-usa.com> <1286468521.20111118024209@mtu-net.ru> In-Reply-To: <1286468521.20111118024209@mtu-net.ru> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help@cygwin.com; run by ezmlm List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner@cygwin.com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin@cygwin.com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin@cygwin.com On 11/17/2011 3:42 PM, Andrey Repin wrote: >> On 11/16/2011 3:20 PM, Andrey Repin wrote: >>> >>> it's a release you need to migrate your working copies >>> to 1.17 without checking them out anew. > >> Are you sure? > > As far as I understand the release notes, you need to run "svn cleanup" with > earlier version, before running "svn upgrade" with current one. I've done three successful tree upgrades with just an "svn upgrade". Perhaps the "cleanup" is only needed in uncommon cases? >> $ ls -d .svn > > 1.7 working copy do not have .svn dirs in nested directories. > http://subversion.apache.org/docs/release-notes/1.7.html#wc-ng Sorry, I remembered that too late. How about "svn st -q ."? -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple