X-Recipient: archive-cygwin@delorie.com
X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.2 required=5.0	tests=AWL,BAYES_00
X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
Date: Mon, 7 Nov 2011 09:01:27 +0100
From: Denis Excoffier <cygwin@Denis-Excoffier.org>
To: cygwin@cygwin.com
Subject: Re: proc_waiter: error on read of child wait pipe
Message-ID: <20111107080151.GA704@po8371>
References: <20111104122905.GA3864@po8371> <20111105084908.GD17783@calimero.vinschen.de>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20111105084908.GD17783@calimero.vinschen.de>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15)
Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help@cygwin.com; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <cygwin.cygwin.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:cygwin-unsubscribe-archive-cygwin=delorie.com@cygwin.com>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-subscribe@cygwin.com>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin@cygwin.com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-help@cygwin.com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-owner@cygwin.com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin@cygwin.com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin@cygwin.com

On Sat, Nov 05, 2011 at 09:49:08AM +0100, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
>> On Nov  4 13:28, Denis Excoffier wrote:
>> > 
>> > Hello,
>> > 
>> > I have all the packages up to date, and also the last Cygwin snapshot:
>> > [...]
>> 
>> Fixed in CVS and the latest snapshot.

Does not seem so.

jupiter% cat /proc/version | tr -d '\100'
CYGWIN_NT-5.1 version 1.7.10s(0.254/5/3) (cgf) (gcc version 4.3.4 20090804 (release) 1 (GCC) ) 20111104 17:08:22
jupiter% /usr/bin/env -i PATH=/usr/bin /bin/tcsh-6.17.06 -fc 'set bar = `echo foo | wc -c`'
    573 [proc_waiter] wc 2032 proc_waiter: error on read of child wait pipe 0x6E8, Win32 error 6
jupiter% echo `echo foo | wc -l`
      3 [proc_waiter] wc 3028 proc_waiter: error on read of child wait pipe 0x700, Win32 error 6

The effect of the last snapshot is:
- the "reattach_children" messages have disappeared
- for two pipes (or more) the messages seem to have disappeared

Can anybody reproduce this? Should i infer that i have to rebase
something?

Regards,

Denis Excoffier

--
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple

