X-Recipient: archive-cygwin@delorie.com
X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.7 required=5.0	tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RP_MATCHES_RCVD,SPF_HELO_PASS
X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
To: cygwin@cygwin.com
From: Mark Geisert <mark@maxrnd.com>
Subject: Re: Problem with execution of binary file
Date: Thu, 3 Nov 2011 19:53:37 +0000 (UTC)
Lines: 10
Message-ID: <loom.20111103T205109-148@post.gmane.org>
References: <1320322806.5480.161.camel@kare-desktop> <4EB29564.8050609@cs.umass.edu> <1320329429.5480.186.camel@kare-desktop>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
User-Agent: Loom/3.14 (http://gmane.org/)
X-IsSubscribed: yes
Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help@cygwin.com; run by ezmlm
List-Id: <cygwin.cygwin.com>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-subscribe@cygwin.com>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin@cygwin.com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-help@cygwin.com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-owner@cygwin.com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin@cygwin.com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin@cygwin.com

Edvardsen Kåre writes:
> Here is a few lines of "od -b" output from both the working and bad
> binary, respectively.
[...]

Maybe more fruitful would be 'objdump -fp' run on both good and bad versions?

..mark




--
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple